it used to be that you could tolerate an action without approving of it - you could criticize it, and criticize the person exhibiting the behaviour in question, but it was tolerant because you were keeping it to civilized channels
so I would say tolerance in the classical sense provides social cohesion - there has to be a level of civility and the expectation of such between individuals who may disagree about issues within the boundaries of "not an existential threat". Tolerance in the postmodern soyboy sense is the ruination of societal structure
Unconditional support is poor, and if you keep quiet that *might* imply you're complicit with their actions but I'm not sure what the delineation is considering "The Squad" thinks that if you support Trump in any capacity then you're [insert every bullshit line in the book].
