Now, that issue might tie into other issues, so you have to have some leeway for that

But you can tie em into the same argument if they are

I still think it's good to bring up his dishonest tactic though. Saying something like "This will never be productive if you're going to continue to manipulate things like this"

Yes

But word it in a way that makes him admit his dishonesty rather than being accusatory

Guess I'm a bit more tired of it than you are at this point

Like "We can't get to the bottom of this issue if you're going to be repeatedly bringing up other issues. I think we both want this to be a productive conversation"

Oh I've tanked a lot of conversations :P

It's like the whole meme of
"Well in Australia they did a gun ban and.."
"Fuck Australia"

I'm just tired of even humoring the clearly alter motive discussion if that makes sense

Tbh people cite Aus because they haven't looked into it

Right. And it's just so annoying at this point where my knee jerk response is "Fuck other countries. This isn't other countries"

Granted if I don't have a history with someone I'm way more open to getting into specfics

But I'm just done letting this guy sneak around

Fair enough

Just keep in mind that online you have an audience

<:KMS:460328759807967243>

Im too disgusted to even be mad

You guys ever see the screen caps of the guy talking about how it's his and his girlfriend's fetish to get abortions?

Maybe we should have a blackpill channel so I don't just obliterate everyone's day

too late

But yeah he was talking about how they've had like 4 already and they always wait until about a month before delivery

Boogaloo fucking when

🤢

Yeah makes me sick man

Whenever you can convince all of your friends to move as one.

Just one man going out to start a war will be shouted down as a radical, so the key is to gather a critical mass of people.

when and where

Area 51?

got it

If I'm being honest nothing will happen unless a number of states decide to ban guns in a short period of times

If they just say "To hell with the constitution, no more guns in our state", then we'll get boogaloo

You need to have the people that are willing to fight, and others to support them. The minimum number of people would have to be no less then 5,000.

That would be way more then the local police, and Swat could handle, but remember you want to leave the option for lawinforcement to join you. By that point you would be able to recruit and defend yourself.

Just so we are clear I believe in the constitution. I also believe that the government has over stepped their authority, so by extension they need to be replaced in accordance with the constitution.

@Tanner that's what my pic was about. I got way more pics if ud like

@gaydadsbear oh gods nomore

@gaydadsbear pls don’t