Message from @JoJo, Kомик
Discord ID: 647849895599931395
Both see a man standing by a river; one sees a forest him, the other sees a city behind him. Neither one is lying.
The only source I saw was the one referencing how it was described in the 1700's
"Left and right was this hundreds of years ago so obviously that's what we should be going on in 2019" is a really weak argument
I mean, it would be stronger if majority opinion agreed with you
When 90% of the population no longer describes left and right that way in the modern era, I would say it's safe to say the meaning has changed
You're going to have to think for once. @Unironic Ohio Supremecist
> When 90% of the population no longer describes left and right that way in the modern era, I would say it's safe to say the meaning has changed
Sauce
Hell, if were going off that then no one is on the right unless they are 100% monarchist
If we really want to be purist about this
@Chet Nick
Think about your incoherent gibberish? Done. It has literally nothing to do with anything.
@JoJo, Kомик
Lol. Nope.
You're operating based on beliefs, and appealing to limited Facts which suit them, but ignoring the Truth of the contemporary world. @Unironic Ohio Supremecist
@Chet Nick
Lol. Nope.
There's lots of Facts which demonstrate the flaw in your beliefs.
Nope.
Yep.
Again, show me a source that says they don't
I'm happy to show you how other sources that don't agree with your view
However, I'm not motivated to do that to someone too lazy to come up with even a shred of evidence that supports them other than "that's what it meant in the 1700's"
And the fact that you absolutely refuse to present that evidence
And simply rely on childish remarks that are basically nothing more than "no u"
That's not really helping your case
Name one.
as someone living in europe, i agree with kevin, simply because i can easily see the difference between left and right here vs the US, and there are huge differences
@JoJo, Kомик
I asked for sources first, and you made the claim. And remember, not philosemitic.
there are none
not the classical liberal variety
right wing wants more gov control
@Unironic Ohio Supremecist *makes a claim*
*Tells the person doubting the claim they first must debunk their claim before they have to defend it*
I'm pretty sure that's called shifting the burden of proof
left wing wants more gov control
@JoJo, Kомик
You made the claim, retard.
Just because a Jew is smart enough to agree with my perspective doesn't invalidate it, especially if said Jew is clearly smarter than you are. @Unironic Ohio Supremecist
That's my point. Why I asked for a source.
there is the FDP, here in germany, but they are so tiny that for a term they went under 5% and were endangered
You made the claim @Unironic Ohio Supremecist
You said "left and right is this"
I pressed X to doubt
Are you really this dense?
@Chet Nick
Lol. Just applying YOUR standard, retard.
@Avald exactly. Liberal means there what it used to mean here, before that word was co-opted and corrupted by Marxists.
I'm having a hard time honestly believing these are your true thoughts at this point
And you're not just trying to troll for the lulz
@Avald
Don't try. They are literally incapable of processing information that doesn't come from Ben Shapiro.
@JoJo, Kомик
Then you're more retarded than I thought.
This stuff predates Shapiru by several decades, dummy. @Unironic Ohio Supremecist
*Makes a claim*
*First refuses to back up claim except weak argument*
*Then claims they don't have to defend their argument because everyone is too stupid to understand even if they did*
Come on, dude
@Chet Nick
Okay... try reading what I said.
Did you write anything of note?
Where?
@JoJo, Kомик
>if I keep saying this demonstrably untrue thing, it'll be true
t. You
@Chet Nick
Lol. So you admit you haven't read anything I've said. And you think that looks bad on me?
Logic makes it True.
You just verbatim admitted to arguing with yourself.