@>is beer#9493 life expectancy isn't a good metric because it doesn't account for death via violent means. You clearly didn't even read what I posted.
You could be the healthiest kid in the world, and that won't do crap if you're shot in Detroit because your culture is a garbage crime ridden mess.
Do I need to spell out why life expectancy isn't a good measure of health when some kid shot up in Detroit brings down the stat? Are adolescent boys less healthy than adolescent girls because men's life expectancy is lower? No.
Lots more goes into being healthy than height and lung capacity or IQ, and not all racial mixing will make you taller smarter or faster, but being mixed race absolutely decreases the odds of you inheriting genetic malformaties that are more common in homogeneous populations.
I don't have time to argue every minute point that the article brings up. Leave it to be the assertion that mixed race children are less healthy due to genetics is blatently false. There is a strict genetic advantage that comes from racial mixing. It's why hybrids and mutts are generally healthier dogs than pure breeds, even when the breeding is done responsibly.
