Well I'm saying Tomi Lahren hasn't given me a reason why her opinion should have any weight. For contrast someone like Laura Ingrahm has a law degree so potentially she bring legal expertise ( i don't actually watch her program)

@scaevola how would what work?

Living close to someone but having different opinions.

@grant fair point, and certainly a much better metric

lol i do it all the time here at berkeley. most ppl here disagree with me @scaevola

@Legalize so maybe a quasi religion

walk amongst the commies

In that case @grant, you must weigh her aguements against themselves.

look at that, agreeing with mandatory 😃

@Big T Still not seeing it.

LOL its cuz you dont train broooo @scaevola 😛

just click his message

you can see what ppl say if their blocked

@Legalize

What can I say, @Big T, you're like a broken clock.
Jesus, @Legalize, ¿you're an admin but you don't know how blocking works? 🤨

@Mandatory Carry so im pretty to look at?

Anyways...
Grant, you must weigh her arguments against themselves; ¿Does what she says make reasonable sense?
Honestly, and I say this holding a history degree myself, very often us supposedly better educated people are fucktarded. I was a better historian ***BEFORE*** my degree, because back then I gave a fuck.
Now, I don't.

🤔

What is different about it?

Those of you what knows Lebens, he posted the link asking *"How does a conspiracy theory become a national security threat?"*
The way a *"conspiracy theory"* becomes a domestic terror threat is:
1. The theory has a potential to incite violence (like 9er17 'could');
Or
2. Something in the theory is too close to the truth about a national security matter.

QAnon claims to be a DOE employee with "Q-level access," meaning **s**/he would know where current nuclear energy and nuclear waste stockpiles are, reactor vulnerabilities, movement schedules, etc.
Any shitposter can claim this. Hell, *I* could be QAnon (I'm not, but go with it), but if QAnon is making the kinds of noises that has the FBI *'concerned,'* then *s*/he's gotten too close to *something.*
https://www.scribd.com/document/420379775/FBI-Conspiracy-Theory-Redacted#download&from_embed

QAnon is the guy who did the show with bryden, no?

He and some other guy

Spicci he is called or something like that

I think he self doxxed but I dont remember the real name

Spicci and some other guy made up QUanon is what I mean

...
¿Oh?

https://www.cato.org/blog/atf-attempts-deny-non-binary-trans-americans-guns

I think thats what you call a crack down on Non Binaries

Its just plain ol fascism

https://buff.ly/2YsAABu

>asks for a simple box check for either male or female sex

>the wacks can't do it because I don't "identify"

Rights are universal, but checking marking a box shouldn't be this fucking difficult.

mmmm

I dont know about that

The former or the latter?

latter

We will likely disagree, then.

Whats your opinion Im not set on this. I just think that you need to tread very carefully when it comes to this stuff. And Im a little disappointed. When I read the headline I thought of centaurs.

Wait, the gun one or the Japan gene editing one?

If the Japan one then yes, I agree that we should be careful.