you're ultimately trying to do something that pleases the majority

but without the majority directly contributing

they i guess capitalism is indirect demcracy

Kinda, yeah. You vote for the favorite product with your wallet, the companies try to win your wallet.

the process of markets could be argued to be democratic, in a sense. However not all "votes" are "equal" in trade

so its good enough for our money but not good enough for our govt?

why would all votes be equal?

thats silly

some people hold more stock

or invest more

Because then you get into monopolies where a bunch of rich people get to decide everything and once again the poor get shit on.

Let me guess

“Social darwinism”

the poor get shit on?

in capitalism?

are you joking?

our poor are the best poor. way better than anyone else

your proposal was dealing with voting with one's feet though

ask anyone

No. In a government, if your suggesting people should have more say than others based on wealth.

nobody has any say

unless they are a shareholder

its a bussiness

the bussiness is providing govt services

business*

if you dont like you dont buy

if the business loses too many customers/residents it fails

and a new one starts to fill the market gap

Yes and if your a shareholder, your part of the country. If everyone in a country is a shareholder, and not all shares are equal

idelly

no anybody can own shares if they buy them

you dont have to live in the country

probably better if you dont. avoids conflicts of interest

Your dealing with masses of living space, not products though. You can’t just go out and make your own country because other people live there and as such have their own society.

Unless you have an army.

obviously youd have an army

probably lots of drones etc

If your a person and don’t like the system you say “get out make your own”

as for the transition to this new system, thats a different story

im talking about the new system itself

say detroit finally gives up pretending to be a real city