Message from @Unironic Ohio Supremecist
Discord ID: 650148197187977217
Lol. No.
You clearly don't read.
Read Practical Idealism.
Do a google translate.
It's good enough.
Read Mary Wollstonecraft on the French Revolution.
Wollstonecraft... doesn't sound Jewish. Doesn't sound English...
313... unitarians.
We have a Prussian school system.
Fascinating.
We have a society that's based on Emersonian Romanticism and determinism/Providence.
It's no wonder we end up with communism.
Romanticism (which the Germans wholly embraced and furthered) ==> Hedonism is Good and Inevitable ==> Determinism/Nihilism
Lol. No.
How the fuck do you avoid communism if you're a fatalist and you object to the idea of a soul and personal choice?
Atheism demands communism.
Or some sort of benevolent state run mommy aperatus.
>How the fuck do you avoid communism if you're a fatalist and you object to the idea of a soul and personal choice?
I don't know. I'm none of those things. But your assertion that our society is Emersonian is laughable.
Have you read Emerson?
>Atheism demands communism.
Also no.
It's the dominant ethic in America. Follow your Bliss.
*American Beauty*
If you try to suppress your bliss, it will backfire.
>Or some sort of benevolent state run mommy aperatus.
Again no, AND you don't seem to know what communism is.
Your bliss is inevitable. Best to let it rule you.
Oh please.
What is your objection to categorizing society as Emersonian in ethic?
You want to talk about Moloch look at Alister Crowley and Scientology.
It's not accurate. In fact under end-stage capitalism we see the EXACT opposite.
Oh please late-stage capitalism.
Like you're a fucking doctor.
Get out of here with your fucking *late-stage capitalism* and use English words that don't do your thinking for you.
Your bliss is not inevitable. Hence why you must perpetually consume next product.
Also determinism.
Exactly the same thing, but in a disillusioned mood.
Emersonian in nature. But more oppressively bitchy. Like DH Lawrence.
Lol. That's an extremely common phrase. Your objection to it just makes you sound retarded.
Your using it makes you retarded.
Especially after talking about "Emersonian Romanticism".
You still don't have a coherent objection to the use of that.