@Annafenza
Lol. What are you even talking about? We were explicitly talking about Christian ethics, and you referred to them as "[my] personal set of divine laws". Your incoherent babbling about your lack of knowledge in no way changes the fact that you were claiming that the Christian ethic is some personal invention of my own.

Moreover you were clearly attempting a passive aggressive shot at condescension. Which I personally also consider dishonest. And a serious bitch move.

Weird modern reformed degenerates are looking for a male figure they can have a good relationship with....

no wonder blacks are more religious on average

@Unironic Ohio Supremecist Gotcha so you can't come up with a single example of me being dishonest. Instead you consider the fact that something that you have been doing to everyone in this conversation is "personally" dishonest. I sorry if I hurt your feelings my dude, I've tried to be as fair and patient with you as possible.

Lol. Except I can. And I did.

You denying something that clearly happened, multiple times, would be another wxample.

As would your attempting to attribute your behaviors to me.

You've tried 3 times to give an example, and all 3 times you've failed

simply repeating the example isn't working

Actually, so would the "sorry if I hurt your feelings" bit. Damn... pulled off a hat trick there.

if you would like to go back through this conversation and find examples of you condescending or insulting people we can do that

Except I didn't fail once.

I gave an example, and you started babbling about something entirely unrelated.

I understand that its in your interest to discard the careful explanation as "unrelated"

you have refused to engage on any point I've brought up and retreated to your ad homs

Lol. The irony...

nice adhom by using adhom

> @Reich Amerikaaner I'm sorry, using a generalized version of a word instead of a specific one in a conversation where I don't know the worldview of the other person is dishonest?
Careful? Maybe. But did it address literally anything I said? No.

That confusion is literally why this entire conversation is happening

Except it's not.

For what must be the fifth time.

And even if it was, you've still disregarded the multiple other examples I gave of your dishonesty.

Accept that each time you give an example, I carefully explain what I meant, and then you just say its unrelated

your position is unfalsifiable

ACCEPT

I love that band

I have no idea what this argument is about but I side with Annafenza just by virtue of kevin acting like an insufferable narcissist over the few messages I saw

That's just how Kevin is

Maybe kevin should change... kind of a one trick pony at this point

When he hides behind these games he doesn't actually have to give a response other than to claim people are in bad faith or mischaracterizing him

He's basically like a blue hair but he has a funny moustache and a pope hat

That must be...tiresome

No, it is very enterataining

All hail Kevin

I enjoyed his spiciness when all my exposure to him was the superchats blond would read but now that I see his "work" all the time... its kinda one note

Yeah, he just seems like a basic Nazi edgelord
Dime a dozen, really

If you've met any other alt righty edgelord in your life and talked to them for about 5 minutes
You've pretty much seen all Kevin has to offer in the ways of comedy

Yeah... I had my fill 12-15 years ago when I was trolling /b/ on 4chan... I've encountered every flavor of troll known and kevin barely crests the top 30%....

top third?

33%?