Message from @Purple
Discord ID: 654082313772204097
@Catboi
Actually not weird at all. You're just borderline retarded and accepted your "nazi bad so all things bad are nazi" programming. Your "thinking" genuinely doesn't seem to go deeper than that.
Oh man this is just like what a Nazi would say
I did Not See this coming
@Annafenza
Great. Changes exactly nothing I said about your dishonesty.
@Catboi
>pedorasts breathe
>cardimom breathes
>cardimom admitted pedorast confirmed
See what I mean about you being borderline retarded?
Also: lol at you calling anyone else a shitlib.
You're a pedorast too?
Does your wife know?
No. See I don't use that retarded unreasoning.
Were you molested by a priest?
Unlike you.
So you don't breathe?
@Unironic Ohio Supremecist Would you give me an example of something that I said that was dishonest?
I just did.
@Unironic Ohio Supremecist I'm sorry, using a generalized version of a word instead of a specific one in a conversation where I don't know the worldview of the other person is dishonest?
seems like the opposite of dishonest
Anyone critical or questioning is dishonest deal with it.
@Annafenza
For the third time. Attributing rules codified millenia ago to me personally is necessarily dishonest.
@Unironic Ohio Supremecist We literally just walked through the confusion there, do you feel that my lack of knowledge of your personal moral system and the consequences it has on language is dishonest?
I'm guessing you don't frequent the discord much @Annafenza
Meet Kevin
we don't need any mention of fountain pens
We're here busy arguing about a religious text that is the foundation of the beliefs Kevin claims to follow, but also claims don't represent what he follows simultaneously
I guess he's just too big brained for us and we're just too dishonest to understand how this circle squares
@Annafenza
Lol. What are you even talking about? We were explicitly talking about Christian ethics, and you referred to them as "[my] personal set of divine laws". Your incoherent babbling about your lack of knowledge in no way changes the fact that you were claiming that the Christian ethic is some personal invention of my own.
Moreover you were clearly attempting a passive aggressive shot at condescension. Which I personally also consider dishonest. And a serious bitch move.
Weird modern reformed degenerates are looking for a male figure they can have a good relationship with....
no wonder blacks are more religious on average
@Unironic Ohio Supremecist Gotcha so you can't come up with a single example of me being dishonest. Instead you consider the fact that something that you have been doing to everyone in this conversation is "personally" dishonest. I sorry if I hurt your feelings my dude, I've tried to be as fair and patient with you as possible.
Lol. Except I can. And I did.
You denying something that clearly happened, multiple times, would be another wxample.
As would your attempting to attribute your behaviors to me.
You've tried 3 times to give an example, and all 3 times you've failed
simply repeating the example isn't working
Actually, so would the "sorry if I hurt your feelings" bit. Damn... pulled off a hat trick there.
if you would like to go back through this conversation and find examples of you condescending or insulting people we can do that
Except I didn't fail once.
I gave an example, and you started babbling about something entirely unrelated.
I understand that its in your interest to discard the careful explanation as "unrelated"
you have refused to engage on any point I've brought up and retreated to your ad homs