Message from @Euro looking for a green card

Discord ID: 497421358318485525


2018-10-04 06:53:19 UTC  

They're trying to get Conservatives on their side with the Christian card, yet again

2018-10-04 06:53:52 UTC  

Sorry but I'm Christian and want nothing more than for that guy to get confirmed

2018-10-04 06:54:01 UTC  

I think they lost Conservatives for a while with their behaviour in the last couple of month!

2018-10-04 06:56:54 UTC  

This will have far reaching consequences. They will never get those that they have lost back

2018-10-04 11:49:15 UTC  

It's kind of annoying that they have completely abandoned any pretense of principled opposition, and now they are just shy of openly stating "I think he's unqualified because I don't like him."

2018-10-04 11:50:02 UTC  

Well gosh, I wish Republicans had known that was a legit reason to oppose a justice when Sotomayor and Kagan were up.

2018-10-04 13:46:09 UTC  

Did anyone watch the video link where these people trolled feminist academic journals?

2018-10-04 14:03:04 UTC  

I haven't seen the video, but I heard Shapiro commenting on it

2018-10-04 14:03:27 UTC  

spoiler alert, it involves 120 seconds of that annoying nasally voice cackling

2018-10-04 14:04:36 UTC  

I said this in my video between the retirement of kennedy and the nomination of Kavanaugh. This isn't anything about how the dems don't like kavanaugh, this is their August Recess Equivalency

2018-10-04 14:05:14 UTC  

Yes, Kavanaugh will make it nearly impossible to legislate from the bench, but it goes further than that, and I knew that from the moment that Kennedy retired

2018-10-04 14:06:24 UTC  

The rhetoric started right there. Trump was going to get to nominate another Justice, and we will be legislated from the bench to make life into the Handmaids Tale

2018-10-04 14:06:54 UTC  

Kavanaugh said he would not actively seek an overturn of Roe but that didn't matter.

2018-10-04 14:07:20 UTC  

I'm partially in the camp that Kennedy retired when he did to put this into action.

2018-10-04 14:08:02 UTC  

This is all a Democrat Campaign. They can't run on the economy, or taxes, or jobs, or society, and they know it.

2018-10-04 14:10:18 UTC  

The house Democrats can run on the Articles of Impeachment, but the Senate had nothing to run on. The Supreme Court Opening made this a single issue midterm. If Kavanaugh gets confirmed, there's nothing for the vulnerable Democrats to run on anymore. I've often said that if Cocaine Mitch gets Kavanaugh through, RBG retires immediately after, to continue the momentum

2018-10-04 14:20:08 UTC  

Nice theory. Like I told Swanky and Wilfred in our voice chat last night, Dems are in infinite regress. They will never stop in their line of reasoning for any one given topic. They went into this with presuppositions, and it doesn't matter what evidence you show them, or what you demonstrate with reasoning.

After beating the dude I debated a few days ago on this case, he then changed tactics and started talking about things that led up to these accusations, completely beside the point.

2018-10-04 14:20:11 UTC  

I don't know if I think that would happen. Not that I doubt you, but I just think RBG has too much pride to actually retire now, instead of trying to survive until Trump is put of office.

2018-10-04 14:51:32 UTC  

If it's all electioneering, I could see it. Find me another policy for Warren to run on

2018-10-04 14:53:16 UTC  

it's important to note that my theory revolves around Brett getting confirmed before the midterms, and Ruthie retiring also before. If she doesn't do it before, she'll be holding on until 2020's election season starts

2018-10-04 14:54:53 UTC  

That would mean she would have to live another 2 full years. Having seen her in an interview lately I wouldn't put money on her outliving this calendar year!

2018-10-04 15:01:13 UTC  

When I talk about the electioneering aspect, I remind people that Gorsuch was perceived to be a more conservative justice than Kavanaugh, but we didn't get near this circus with him

2018-10-04 15:04:03 UTC  

Don't you think that Dems and the Media were so invested in the Trump/Russia hysteria and were still under shock that Ms Glassealing wasn't elected that they hadn't quiet gotten their #Resist-apparatus in motion?

2018-10-04 15:04:33 UTC  

Their resist apparatus was in motion long before 11/9

2018-10-04 15:05:24 UTC  

I don't think they were quiet comfortable to leave everything behind and go full extreme Left.

2018-10-04 16:02:40 UTC  

I think the best part is that the democrats were borderline guaranteed to take the house in november if they had just shut the f up

2018-10-04 16:02:55 UTC  

instead they keep doing stupid shit that makes everyone hate them

2018-10-04 16:05:29 UTC  

We need to figure out how to troll those feminist academic papers.

2018-10-04 16:05:35 UTC  

It would be amazing.

2018-10-04 17:56:37 UTC  

Everyone. I have a MeToo story and it’s hilarious.

2018-10-04 17:56:43 UTC  

Lol

2018-10-04 17:57:53 UTC  

I was legitimately sexually harassed by a drunk girl. She groped my pelvic region. It was awkward. Then I got over it. Zero trauma. Zero ptsd.

2018-10-04 18:00:15 UTC  

I refer to her as the eye of Sauron. A vertical slit, burning around the edges, whose desire for reverse cowgirls is never quenched.

2018-10-04 18:29:23 UTC  

Just want to share my argument, even though I'm sure this won't be read on the show.
Regarding the AnCap position on borders.
AnCap is about the NAP. No aggression is legitimate. Any defense against aggression is legitimate. Illegal immigration is almost entirely about stealing additional funds from my income. Therefore, closing the border to illegal immigrants is in defense against aggression.

2018-10-04 18:30:22 UTC  

You can't control national borders in ancapistan. Only your own borders

2018-10-04 18:30:37 UTC  

We are not in Ancapistan.

2018-10-04 18:30:50 UTC  

The only illegal immigration is based on violation of your property rights

2018-10-04 18:30:57 UTC  

You're arguing from an ancap perspective

2018-10-04 18:31:09 UTC  

Yes

2018-10-04 18:33:00 UTC  

From an ancap perspective you cannot have "illegal immigration" in the conventional sense, merely property violations, so if the border town wants to bring in a fuckton of people who then move to your town, that's a-ok. On the flip side, association is up to you

2018-10-04 18:34:38 UTC  

Why can there be no illegal immigration? Is there not a kind of immigration that is illegal?
They are coming here in aggression of my income.