to muc booly

and he didn't go after someone with any real power or position he went after random unarmed people

in a place of vulnerability

all the text he wrote on his weapon were the names of victims in Europe of Islamic terror.

if he had the strength of his convictions to go after a hate preacher that's one thing but just people

not justifying just pointing out.

This whole yang gang thing btw redpilled me on how retarded accelerationism is

innocent people sacrificed for bullshit

it's just nihilism

or how retarded people are

how is it different than what Antifa do?

@Islamic Space Program its ok theyre all sand people

so horrible

No. Murder is always bad

It is always wrong

and you know what's going to come out of this, Muslim communities already get protection from the police that's let them run grooming gangs and ghettoise communities now that'll just increase
they can play the victim some more

thats funny to me.

@Salacious Swanky Cat speak words to me. defend your beliefs.

Just watched the whole shooting part of the video. fucked up

Why should I?

I tried but keep just seeing snippets.

I'm doing something else now

because if you are going to claim morality is objective then defend your position.

because morality is very subjective.

morality isnt objective, shooting people in a mosque is totally morally acceptable because muh acceletationism
/s

it was acceptable to him. his subjective point of view.

Oh. So you think child rape is acceptable

You think it's perfectly fine to do if someone wants to

personally i dont but im sure some people do.

And you are ok with people doing that

What's hilarious is that you think your position is defensible @cap'n creamery

with people having different subjective view than me?

With people raping children

come into vc and i will defend it.

You are ok with it

no im not

Oh, so raping children is wrong?

No it wasnt acceptable to him. He knew that killing people is wrong. He put his political beliefs above his morality. You are retarded

in my subjective point of view yes its wrong.

It's objectively wrong.

no its not