i dont even have a dog in this fight, but its such a strawman to say theyre pedos

40 yo fuck 18yo men all the time

40 yo women*

keep the argument simple: a cosmetic opinion isn't justification for surgery on an infant

i can agree with that point c1pher

Wait, how is circumcision a pedo issue

it addresses the response without rediculous moral panic "oh no pedo!"

scroll up a bit @SpanishAbbey

Then it comes to the point that, If 40 get to oppurtunity to be with someone 18 (they shouldnt be that picky)

theres some smoking hot older chicks out there bro.

More like the 18 year olds should feel lucky

ive had my share of cougars and theyre great

I wished I could get Some Cougar 😏

but arent they pedos?

do you see now how silly this is?

thats all im getting at

That wasn't his argument BigTravis, tho his argument wasn't good either.

shadows, it was

its not his argument for/against circumcision, but it was for responding to female claims that "it looks better"

him and i arent having a debate over circumcision, but rather, if finding the apperance of adult penises a case of pedophilia

The pedo stuff was thing of present day children as tough they where tomorrow's sex parent, not already grown ups who are 20 years youger 😂

His argument wouldn't call cougars pedos. It's saying that anyone believing you should cut a baby for something they would like better down the road seems a bit pedoy... But that wasn't a good argument.

youre being pedantic shadows

i was being hyperbolic in saying "cougars pedos"

That I can agree with @Shadows

and no i dont think it's "pedoish"

@Big T I know you were being hyperbolic, but it didn't fit to what his point was.

Not "Cougar pedos" I claimed that considering babies future sex partnerns was a bit of a pedo warning

how is that pedophilic?

Its not, i said its a bad argument.

like literally pedophilia is the sexual attraction to prepubescent persons

the anatomy of an adult (future self of a child) is exactly what theyre not attracted to

HENCE why its a strawman to call them pedos

If considering penis looks for future partners is weird, isn't talking about their sexual feelings without circumcision in the same realm

For those who hadn't seen my argument on the topic.

Many might not care, but will still bring this up. For those who still argue for circumcision (or maybe even those who don't care).
Circumcision started as an effort to controlling male sexuality https://youtu.be/ESnSxIpabgQ (small video about that) and nothing to do with "health" (outside of when its medically necessary), this has only come in to discussion in an attempt to justify a terrible practice. Any "benefit" people will point to for this practice can easily be dealt with from normal care. MGM is no different then FGM (and most times worst).
This http://www.circumcisionharm.org/research.htm has a lot of studies and links about the topic.
And here are some videos about the issue
https://youtu.be/tL5repF3JFc
https://youtu.be/U5mVLCrrmQo
https://youtu.be/Mdh5IYg7A9E
https://youtu.be/xd81GBsk62g

I could bring up more links and videos about this topic, but many may find this issue annoying or not worth their time. But this is still a big issue that effects mostly men/boys around the world (and some women). Feel free not to care, and i won't tell you to not say what you want, but maybe check out a video from Karan on the topic if you wish to downplay this issue https://youtu.be/LxhJXw0I4EA.

oh for sure. one of the kellog brothers was instrumental in popularizing it

to prevent masturbation

hell the graham cracker was invented to prevent masturbation as well

lol the early 20th century had some nutty prudes

Then big lotion got involved

big lotion is owned by (((them)))