<:PepeLaugh:482600580771086345>

💀

are you suggesting the libs killed my WW2 Japan theater Veteran grandfathers?

yes that's what secretly tortured him in Japan

libs from the future

he didn't see combat, he drove supply trucks

<:peepoDetective:601821289237184522>

well one did, the other I"m not sure where he was stationed

@Legalize sounds interesting wt y'all talk about?

did they get to guns in the interview at some point i watched like 15 minutes and then turned on something more exciting: music

joe or bernie?

doesn't surprise me

i love 2a,but... lol stop, shall not be infringed

Bernie's a privileged gun grabber that can spontaneously combust for all I care.

He'll turn to dust first

Perfect.

Are there any Dems that aren't gun-grabbers?
*Or any Republicans for that matter?*

>implying politicians care about your rights

I think almost all of them would gungrab

You might get a few libertarian-as-republicans who wouldnt

Anyone of authority and in power.

Which includes the Government.

Well, the majority.

But they aren't to be trusted.

normies with guns means politicians can't force top down because their afraid of millions of people rioting, take away guns first, then top down auth ctrl

I think there should be mandatory rusty pitchfork task that are shoved up their ass everytime they pass this bullshit.

https://youtu.be/XSfgxWt8Rf0

This is a VERY BAD idea...

So they propose enabling law enforcement to premptively take away someone's firearms BEFORE following due process.

They hang their hat on some dubious standard of 'mental health' that is entirely subjective.

we don't give terrorists due process

you don't have any IDEA if the person is a 'terrorist'. ANY dissedent is by DEFINITION a 'terrorist'

George Washington? TERRORIST

yup

any dissenter is a terrorist

you get it

Any dissent of the government can be interpreted as 'terrorist activity' and any object to the government can be brushed under the rug by labeling it 'crazy'

Might as well support direct confisciation if you support these policies because you know damn well the person in charge of assessing 'mental health' will be an anti-gun liberal

That moment when they claim "buy back program" that of which is to be voluntary, but ultimately will be mandatory.

How to make an enemy out of your citizens 101

Agreed. It's the same basic argument; trust THEM to decide who can have a firearm and who cannot.