That wasn’t a rhetorical question?

Well you said you were black in the Vaush video, so I just wanted to ask for reference since I wanna see if you're like, a regular black nationalist or specifically aborigine Australian nationalist.

You can check through the entire two-hour video to find where he said that by the way, anyone who's watching this battle of intellectual titans

When did I say I was black?

In the Vaush video, my dude

no I didnt

Yeah, you did! Why are you lying, dude, it's in the video

It's on record, or is that not you?

I dont get if this is a bit or something

I honestly cant tell if you're trying to make a joke or something

but you sound insnae

I mean I didn't know if it was a bit when you said you'd gotten Vaush to admit that the nazis are right and he's a nazi now, so I dunno man, what seems more likely

I guess we'll never know

So like, if you're Islamist and black, are you a Nation of Islam type?

You wnat me to go through and time stamp it when he says/recognises that Jews were instrumental to pushing Social liberalism, dominating banking/high finance?

And Jews being dominate in Marxist movements

Yes.

Alright, I'll get back to with that

Now, let's be clear here

Actually, let's be super clear and go back to compare what you just claimed was in the video to what you posted earlier before you can go back and edit that

go ahead

`@Morf vaush conceeded to all my points
He admitted Zionists are hypocrites, jews dominate modern day capitalism and are responsible for social liberalisation
Also the roots of leftists movements especially in Europe bei Jewish

“We have more cheap products to consume and more types of sugar water”
Yeh vaush got me real good`

Yes, the last part was me mocking him for saying "Material conditions have gotten better"

THe res is correct

**Even if** you do dig into the video and find cases where Vaush says something that could be misconstrued as him saying that Jewish plotting was intentionally propping up the development of social liberalism and marxism, that hardly means he conceded to ALL your points.

Unless you want to say that he was conceding to you when he pinned you down and got you to admit you were using a bullshit definition of 'nation' meaning 'race'

No, since he working on a modern definition and me a traditionalist on a traditional definition

didnt disprove anything lol

No, he's working on the socially accepted definition, and you're working off of a made-up definition you use to cower from your actual beliefs

"made up definition"

Because you are, of course, a nazi, and also a coward. Bit of a tautology.

Yes, friend. You're using a definition that is not in line with common parlance which is engineered to hide your own views.

? Me saying I'm a Fascist and Hitler did nothing wrong is me hiding my beliefs?

*Just say 'race'*

Me using words correctly is an issue?

No, you *lying* about your beliefs to sanitize them for your audience is an issue

Why don't you just say 'racial' sovereignty

they are interchangable was my point

Do you think that the word 'race' is inaccurate in some way?

no, and I did use race

when describing the issues