Message from @Methode

Discord ID: 664242642103697419


2020-01-07 22:57:14 UTC  

Vs Probably X?

2020-01-07 22:57:33 UTC  

Sm1 make an announcement

2020-01-07 22:57:35 UTC  

Most people... don't care about that...
Probably X
vs
It is probable that X

2020-01-07 22:57:50 UTC  

@Marcdoof clarify

2020-01-07 22:57:55 UTC  

Methodes bible told him to steal the oil

2020-01-07 22:59:39 UTC  

`Before the 2003 invasion, Iraq's domestic oil industry was fully nationalized and closed to Western oil companies. A decade of war later, it is largely privatized and utterly dominated by foreign firms.
`

2020-01-07 22:59:41 UTC  

JUSTIFIED

2020-01-07 22:59:45 UTC  

this war ended socialism

2020-01-07 23:00:18 UTC  

This is a topic change

2020-01-07 23:00:33 UTC  

The syllogism still seems functional even when grammatically incorrect but meh
woman on discord is 50% probably trans
trans is 50% probably slut
woman on discord is 25% probably slut
^ yours

woman on discord is 50% probability of being trans
trans is 50% probability of being slut
woman on discord is 25% probability of being slut
^ fixt grammatic issue?
Seems like it is still effectively equivalent...

2020-01-07 23:01:11 UTC  

Whatever

2020-01-07 23:01:35 UTC  

You feel like "is" is definite and not probable

2020-01-07 23:01:41 UTC  

usually yes

2020-01-07 23:01:42 UTC  

But you can see how that even explodes if you say

2020-01-07 23:01:45 UTC  

especially in context of syllogisms

2020-01-07 23:01:56 UTC  

like "X is Y" usually implies absolute

2020-01-07 23:01:57 UTC  

The black community *IS*

2020-01-07 23:02:02 UTC  

And you use some pluralistic semantics

2020-01-07 23:02:56 UTC  

šŸ˜šŸ‘‰šŸ›šŸ‘¼ @Methode

2020-01-07 23:03:06 UTC  

Lol

2020-01-07 23:04:10 UTC  

Men is pluralistic though

2020-01-07 23:07:47 UTC  

@actual_communist_boi Are you actually committed to moral realism? Seems ... like it doesn't cash out for anything

2020-01-07 23:08:13 UTC  

Side walk - weird walk that sways to one side

2020-01-07 23:08:39 UTC  

Oh, it sounds like it semantic of...
There's no definition so I can't identify as a realist or skeptic

2020-01-07 23:12:56 UTC  

<:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388> This is why text is great

2020-01-07 23:13:34 UTC  

I think it's pretty normal for people to miss some number of words in context

2020-01-07 23:14:52 UTC  

Philosophy bad

2020-01-07 23:15:08 UTC  

^ unironically this

2020-01-07 23:15:21 UTC  

^

2020-01-07 23:16:59 UTC  

@Methode Iā€™m convinced commie boi is trolling

2020-01-07 23:17:21 UTC  

It's always 50/50

2020-01-07 23:18:10 UTC  

what goin on

2020-01-07 23:20:44 UTC  

Methode trolling and having SSRI amnesia on his everyone pings <:pepehands:644890202304937994>

2020-01-07 23:20:47 UTC  
2020-01-07 23:20:51 UTC  

<:Feelsweirdman:644895953064820776>

2020-01-07 23:23:35 UTC  

There's nothing irrational about that...

2020-01-07 23:23:55 UTC  

@Marcdoof If one defines moral realism as "having toenails", all people with toenails are that

2020-01-07 23:24:04 UTC  

It's vacuous and silly

2020-01-07 23:24:07 UTC  

But... again

2020-01-07 23:25:03 UTC  

You can arrive on truth of any proposition if you're going to redefine the term based on the language game