Binary.

validity is when the conclusion(s) follow if the premises are true

right

1: If X occurred in method Y in the past, X can occur in method Y in the future.
2: X occurred in method Y in the past.
3: X can occur in method Y in the future.

Silly jism

modus ponens debate in <#628013859776626711>

wow.

Douglas Walton has brain damage? geez.

Pogan: "Transition of ownership of MOP from feudalism to capitalism is binary."

🅱rain 🅱amage

*academic* Douglas Walton.

modus ponens are almost never about the implication

@actual_communist_boi

oh thanks

I wasn't aware

pogan does strike me

C R A Z Y P I L L S

as someone with a lot of time on their hands

it seems uncontroversial to say

BOTH OF YOU HAVE A BURDEN OF PROOF AAAAAAAAAAA

<a:eyeshake:630803805180526602>

AAAAAAAAAAA

that's a fine answer!

@•Luke• nah

@Jason Lee Scott get in here

omfg what did i walk into

he just has to answer!

hoyl shit

pogans claim is self evident

silly gay man

?

@Jason Lee Scott pogan is taking on actual communist boi

“No u have burden”
“No u”
“No u”
“No u”

ALL PROPISITIONS HAVE A BURDEN OF PROOF FUCK

Pogan: "Transition of ownership of MOP from feudalism to capitalism is binary."

Whats the argument for that?

Pogan: "Transition of ownership of MOP from feudalism to capitalism is binary."
ACB: "Transition of ownership of MOP from feudalism to capitalism is gradient."
Who has BOP?

there's no formal rule for burden of proof?

i was cheering on acb

but pogan won the debate

<:pepeLMAO:644901342216847388>