same @Marcdoof

I'm glad we can obfuscate this hard about basic Bayesian inference

Doubt <:doobyirl:602961252075175965> @Reclan

look at our DMs

the proof is in the pudding

Shit

I concede

E

e

fine

lol

Fine is fuzzy

Non answer

He can’t even answer that

What a looooossserrrr

https://tenor.com/view/goku-fight-freeza-dbz-attack-gif-9038397

What

يا له من كذاب سخيف يا صديق. يا له من سخيف قليلا ، كذاب ، المتأنق. يا له من سخيف ، قليلا كذاب ، المتأنق. القرف المقدس ، المتأنق. المقدسة القرف سخيف ، المتأنق. الكذب حرفيا. لا يزال يكذب على جمهوره.

@•Luke• Could be that a given policy would probably result in a given result. Independent amount of variables can explain the propability of
the result occurring.

يا له من كذاب سخيف يا صديق. يا له من سخيف قليلا ، كذاب ، المتأنق. يا له من سخيف ، قليلا كذاب ، المتأنق. القرف المقدس ، المتأنق. المقدسة القرف سخيف ، المتأنق. الكذب حرفيا. لا يزال يكذب على جمهوره.

Quel putain de menteur, mec. Quel putain de petit WEASELLY, menteur, mec. Quel putain de petit menteur WEASELLY, mec. Putain de merde, mec. SAINTE putain de merde, mec. Mentir littéralement. MENTANT ENCORE à son public.

Syllogism 3:
X -> Y.
X.
Y.

Stop speaking klingong

modus ponens

<:doobyirl:602961252075175965>

omg

nosebleedah

nose bleeders!

oh shit!

@Deleted User 1a96c490 oh my god

Why

hahaaa.

OH MY GOD

1: If X occurred in method Y in the past, X can occur in method Y in the future.
2: X occurred in method Y in the past.
3: X can occur in method Y in the future.

NUCLEAR

it's literally a low IQ thing not to be able to engage in hypotheticals lmfao

10/10

@actual_communist_boi get back in there