"The mass movement approach is bullshit because you canât offer the people even an illusion of being able to give them something back. What do you have? You canât enter the political system and those who still fancy the tactic of entryism can keep stepping on the same rake and look just as pathetic as Nick Griffin did on Question Time. Let the BNP stand as a shining example of why entryism will always fail.
And so will the mass movement approach. Amazingly, weâve been provided all the answers on our Struggle long ago by its Champions from Hitler and Mein Kampf to James Mason and SIEGE. We should already know all this, and yet here we are again going over all this. Itâs a more or less accepted metaphor by now that the masses are like a woman, and you are going to win her over by begging? The mass approach calls of â[please] join our movementâ, âshow up for our rallyâ, âread our policies, youâll like themâ and âsee, weâre presentable!â sound no different than âOh please give me a chance, go out on a date with me, I promise youâll like it, Iâm such a good guy!â
The saying âbeggars canât be choosersâ really is the slogan of the mass movement, as the goal is to increase quantity, so what does it matter who joins? Itâs still a +1, right? That wouldnât be a problem for any other movement â but ours? In our Struggle? It is devastating as it goes entirely against our principles. The desire for quantity means casting a wide net, it means compromises, it means softening oneâs principles and making exceptions, every possible step back until you are left with something bigger but less defined, an amorphous gray blob with no real power to it."
