Message from @ᚱᛟᛟᛏ
Discord ID: 548991311114403876
They do more for themselves and others than most do at all.
Farmers literally provide all of yours and your neighbors food
No way
I mean, they are necessary
Like nearly all other members of the society
Theyre the foundation of society. I dont see any normies growing their own food.
"They're necessary, but are they really more valuable than anyone else?" <:poggers:531564093891674143> <:poggers:531564093891674143> <:poggers:531564093891674143> <:poggers:531564093891674143> <:poggers:531564093891674143> <:poggers:531564093891674143> <:poggers:531564093891674143> <:poggers:531564093891674143> <:poggers:531564093891674143>
Quite a lot of normies do that here
Growing your own food is pretty dope imo, I wonder if our trees will give some fruits this year
It is. Though in North America no young people do it
Most farmers are 65+
In US and Canada
BTW, Spooky, cause now I'm curious
How would you define a "valuable" or "worthy" person?
The one you become when you "become a better person"?
Seriously?
A lot of my peers work on farms
My friend knows how to drive a tractor since he was 12
Someone who isnt 1. Lazy 2. Pretentious 3. Sanctimonious 4. Greedy and 5. Narcissistic/self absorbed
Its a dying profession in the west.
Maaan I'm all 5 of that
Laure I don't believe any of that because you've always constantly just been full of BS.
Though I don't think most shitty people can ever change their ways. They're like that for a reason, they're usually fucked beyond repair
If that was the case you wouldn't be bwwildered at considering them more valuable people than average.
Eastern Europeans need to let communism go
I'm not bewildered, I was just curious
Farmers aren't really revered here, actually there's a lot of prejudice against rural people
My mother comes from rural family, we still cultivate small plot of the land in the countryside
And root, you set a bar pretty low
I'd say that most people fulfill all 5 conditions
And if they already fulfill them, how can they improve?
It has to be something more challenging imo
no thats my point exactly. most people suck and are unworthy of life.
Wow rude
85% are beasts living by their instincts, 5% - conscious Human beings and 10% - people that cna achive Humanhood.
First you improve into Humanhood. Then you improve into absolute neutrality mindset. Then you try to live and advance like that.
Then you die and exist in the higher dimensional realm without any shitty hierarchies hopefully
@ᚱᛟᛟᛏ I understand both this and what you previously stated
It's not like I don't often feel this way, that there are these two classes of people, of intelligent, conscious individuals and a gray mass of hoi polloi, everyone does so
But I think it is just an illusion
And saying that someone's unworthy of life is imo incredibly stupid
We often forget that humans are only animals after all, and having some higher expectations of them than of other animals just because they are slightly more intelligent doesn't make much sense
If the mouse deserves to live only because it had good genes and enough luck to survive, then why doesn't that apply to humans?
I used to be a lot of going-against-these-all-disgusting-animal-instincts type of person Kisa tbh
Humans are only animals when its convenient for them to be only animals
Then theyre above animals when its convenient
Sick of all these false caveats
Wdym by "above animals"?
I mean that you're subjective when its convenient for you and you'd be saying the opposite to justify some other aspect of humanity when it becomes easier for you to do so
I guess so, humans are natural hypocrites
No they're not.