First you improve into Humanhood. Then you improve into absolute neutrality mindset. Then you try to live and advance like that.

Then you die and exist in the higher dimensional realm without any shitty hierarchies hopefully

@ᚱᛟᛟᛏ I understand both this and what you previously stated
It's not like I don't often feel this way, that there are these two classes of people, of intelligent, conscious individuals and a gray mass of hoi polloi, everyone does so
But I think it is just an illusion

And saying that someone's unworthy of life is imo incredibly stupid
We often forget that humans are only animals after all, and having some higher expectations of them than of other animals just because they are slightly more intelligent doesn't make much sense
If the mouse deserves to live only because it had good genes and enough luck to survive, then why doesn't that apply to humans?

I used to be a lot of going-against-these-all-disgusting-animal-instincts type of person Kisa tbh

Humans are only animals when its convenient for them to be only animals

Then theyre above animals when its convenient

Sick of all these false caveats

Wdym by "above animals"?

I mean that you're subjective when its convenient for you and you'd be saying the opposite to justify some other aspect of humanity when it becomes easier for you to do so

I guess so, humans are natural hypocrites

No they're not.

Most people are hypocrites but being a hypocrite is not a quality inherent to humanity

They are
They always like to say one thing and do the opposite

Then why are most people hypocrites?

Not everyone is like that

s o c i e t y?

I know

Because humanity in its current state is low quality genetically

>muh, genes

Genes aren't everything, environment is much important in most cases

Genes predispose you

Your genes determine how you interact with the environment and what the environment is interacting with

neither is more important than the other but genes make or break a situation

I'd say the otherwise, especially if we're speaking about human behaviour

Thats like saying theres no difference between a bird or a dog

Nd environment is what determines the difference between the two

Whats the main difference between those two things? Genes

Also before you say races arent that different from each other, theyre about as different as breeds are to dogs

And there's this whole thing called "epigenetics" or something like that really raises a question about actual importance of our genom as it is

^^they are less different

Objectively I mean, there were studies on that

And a breed will interact with the environment differently than others would

And human races works in a bit different way

you literally could not say that though? All rraces developed apart from each other at different intervals over differing amounts of years thousands of years apart

So how would you know every single race wasnt that different

The difference between a Native American and an Asian is 25k-30k years apart

But theyre "not that different "

Human "races" in common modern meaning of this word aren't taxonomycal units and there's a specific reason for that I've read about, but I don't remember exactly what is this reason
I'll post something about that tomorrow

Lol give me a break

Comparing to the age of life?
Not this much tbh

Much more than dog breeds