Message from @Tato
Discord ID: 568489597202595840
Almost as bad as their obsession with the material.
Money buys happiness rite?
😂
not always
but it can
depends why you're sad
>excuse me sir, but this 6 year old boy have explicitly stated that he doesn't mind, I've got it on paper
>it's not slavery! my workers consensually agreed to work twelve hours a day without health insurance and safety restrictions for a bowful of rice a day
<:ancap:402195844218093570>
again
if they agree to it
then yeah
😏
im not an ancap
I dontbelieve in slavery
No it's not!slavery(tm) if you pay them just above the minimum for slavery.
Based, I also think that there's no such a think as economic violence
Fractions of the dollar.
Well, Congolese did agree to the conditions of Belgians
The fact that they had guns pointed at their faces doesn't change a thing
Sounds like consent to me.
Gunboat diplomacy is always on the menu as long as you don't use your guns.
Enjoying your freedom to line up all of your navy around the coast, cutting people off from supplies.
It's not wrong though, you're just standing.
And it's definitely not a blockade.
>hey, they have a choice, then can choose to starve
Yeah just grow food lmao
i they're being thretened by guns than it is *in fact* a violation of the NAP
Nope.
They're gunboats.
That aren't doing anything.
Just sitting there.
Yeah, but if they are threatned by starvation it's not a violation of NAP
And I'm not even talking about the gunboat scenario
Sieges aren't an NAP violation because all you've done is line people up *just* outside of the other parties' property limits.
Just a hair outside, so it's not a violation.
That's how libertarian economy works - you can choose to live in poverty or choose not to live at all
^
It's an exploit or be exploited world.
Imagine believing that Killdozer wasn't justified in his actions.
Because he violated the NAP after all parties involved took every measure to fuck over his business.