most people have a "god"

a basis for truth or the foundation of their viewpoint

I'm not inclined that we can achieve 100% truth though. We'd need to become omniscient

sure, but what i'm saying is that each individual has some basis by which they validate truth

and that's their "god" so to speak

egalitarianism isn't a god, its not something we pray to, its a value that human beings have equal worth

not exactly a bad value to have

but when that idea of equal value is met with inequality in the real world, then it turns into religious dogma

if that inequality is a result of natural processes

like high IQ populations doing better in the world

it's being called white privilege by racial egalitarians

but white people just do better because they are smarter on average

Not sure how that relates to egalitarianism.

then i don't think you know what egalitarianism means

@Gyohdon that's progressiveism. They're looking for equality of outcome not equality of opprotunity

progressivism is a subclass of egalitarianism

They're pushing for quotas. That in no way is equality of opprotunity though

egalitarianism isnt just equality of opportunity

According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the term has two distinct definitions in modern English:[5] either as a political doctrine that all people should be treated as equals and have the same political, economic, social, and civil rights;[6] or as a social philosophy advocating the removal of economic inequalities among people, economic egalitarianism, or the decentralization of power. Some sources define egalitarianism as the point of view that equality reflects the natural state of humanity.

and all three of them are false

egalitarianism is a revolutionary philosophy and thus is completely false

It saying 2

Which is the 3rd?

"Some sources define egalitarianism as the point of view that equality reflects the natural state of humanity."

the last line

I'd subscribe more to the 1st than the 2nd or 3rd ones

so you think women should have the same rights as men?

Yes

disgusting

literally kys

racial egalitarians aren't egalitarians dude

because promoting one race over others isn't egalitarian

Equality of opprotunity provides for those who are better at the particular task to rise to the top. Doing so other wise limits potential and thus the economy

Pretty much true.

There's no real reason to specifically discriminate and disadvantage groups of people.

Individuals yes, but not huge groups.

Don't take that too literally.

race realism aside valuing the life of all human beings is still the right way to live

race realism is autistic though

you don't have to value their ideas, or philosophy but their right to lives

to live*