Message from @dubspepper

Discord ID: 641453221239324683


2019-11-06 00:18:33 UTC  

Billy Harrington is eternal

2019-11-06 00:35:52 UTC  

hes dead

2019-11-06 00:36:18 UTC  

~~That's not actually Billy~~

2019-11-06 00:36:44 UTC  

*shush*

2019-11-06 00:36:49 UTC  

moron

2019-11-06 01:23:37 UTC  

aight so I'll assume that the MRA barrels + radian bolt are actually fine because the .223 rem go/no-go gauges are, well, shorter than a 5.56 fail gauge
the slight catching + friction of the bolt lugs on the chamber lugs on a .223 no-go leads me to believe that while it fails the no-go, it would "pass" both a .223 field and a 5.56 field "failure" gauge, making it safe to operate as it would likely not go into battery with an additional .003" and for sure not with the +0.01" of a 5.56 field gauge
this would make sense because, since the bolt is supposed to be mil-spec (and by all measurements the lugs are), it would be based on 5.56 gauges and is otherwise fine to operate, despite the .223 no-go failure. I also won't reload my 5.56 brass, so a short brass life means nothing to me

Now the question is my .308, which is the biggest fuck up of it all. Past return date, 25% restock fee if they do accept it, no indication of why it is not working properly. Meaning I have to drive an hour away and ask another company if I can keep fingerfucking their barrels and using the gauge dildo until I find a barrel that works with my bolt.

2019-11-06 01:24:00 UTC  

aight so I'll assume that the MRA barrels + radian bolt are actually fine because the .223 rem go/no-go gauges are, well, shorter than a 5.56 fail gauge
the slight catching + friction of the bolt lugs on the chamber lugs on a .223 no-go leads me to believe that while it fails the no-go, it would "pass" both a .223 field and a 5.56 field "failure" gauge, making it safe to operate as it would likely not go into battery with an additional .003" and for sure not with the +0.01" of a 5.56 field gauge
this would make sense because, since the bolt is supposed to be mil-spec (and by all measurements the lugs are), it would be based on 5.56 gauges and is otherwise fine to operate, despite the .223 no-go failure. I also won't reload my 5.56 brass, so a short brass life means nothing to me

Now the question is my .308, which is the biggest fuck up of it all. Past return date, 25% restock fee if they do accept it, no indication of why it is not working properly. Meaning I have to drive an hour away and ask another company if I can keep fingerfucking their barrels and using the gauge dildo until I find a barrel that works with my bolt.

2019-11-06 01:24:30 UTC  

aight so I'll assume that the MRA barrels + radian bolt are actually fine because the .223 rem go/no-go gauges are, well, shorter than a 5.56 fail gauge
the slight catching + friction of the bolt lugs on the chamber lugs on a .223 no-go leads me to believe that while it fails the no-go, it would "pass" both a .223 field and a 5.56 field "failure" gauge, making it safe to operate as it would likely not go into battery with an additional .003" and for sure not with the +0.01" of a 5.56 field gauge
this would make sense because, since the bolt is supposed to be mil-spec (and by all measurements the lugs are), it would be based on 5.56 gauges and is otherwise fine to operate, despite the .223 no-go failure. I also won't reload my 5.56 brass, so a short brass life means nothing to me

Now the question is my .308, which is the biggest fuck up of it all. Past return date, 25% restock fee if they do accept it, no indication of why it is not working properly. Meaning I have to drive an hour away and ask another company if I can keep fingerfucking their barrels and using the gauge dildo until I find a barrel that works with my bolt.

2019-11-06 01:24:41 UTC  

aight so I'll assume that the MRA barrels + radian bolt are actually fine because the .223 rem go/no-go gauges are, well, shorter than a 5.56 fail gauge
the slight catching + friction of the bolt lugs on the chamber lugs on a .223 no-go leads me to believe that while it fails the no-go, it would "pass" both a .223 field and a 5.56 field "failure" gauge, making it safe to operate as it would likely not go into battery with an additional .003" and for sure not with the +0.01" of a 5.56 field gauge
this would make sense because, since the bolt is supposed to be mil-spec (and by all measurements the lugs are), it would be based on 5.56 gauges and is otherwise fine to operate, despite the .223 no-go failure. I also won't reload my 5.56 brass, so a short brass life means nothing to me

Now the question is my .308, which is the biggest fuck up of it all. Past return date, 25% restock fee if they do accept it, no indication of why it is not working properly. Meaning I have to drive an hour away and ask another company if I can keep fingerfucking their barrels and using the gauge dildo until I find a barrel that works with my bolt.

2019-11-06 01:36:09 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/558106673911169035/641450720674971670/image0.jpg

2019-11-06 01:43:17 UTC  

are gorkas a meme or should I actually import one

2019-11-06 01:43:33 UTC  

meme, don’t

2019-11-06 01:43:39 UTC  

rog thanks

2019-11-06 01:43:49 UTC  
2019-11-06 01:44:14 UTC  

they look neato and comfy but i dont want to spend 150 on a meme

2019-11-06 01:44:46 UTC  

hi

2019-11-06 01:44:53 UTC  

theyre kind of a meme

2019-11-06 01:44:59 UTC  

thats what Im worried about

2019-11-06 01:45:11 UTC  

unless you need a windbreaker set

2019-11-06 01:45:35 UTC  

for dry cold stuff

2019-11-06 01:46:05 UTC  

i live in a fairly tame climate, winter rarely gets below -5 but it rains alot since im coastal

2019-11-06 01:46:13 UTC  

gorkas aren’t waterproof right?

2019-11-06 01:46:17 UTC  

not too much snow

2019-11-06 01:46:20 UTC  

theyre very not waterpoof

2019-11-06 01:46:23 UTC  

afaik they’re just big windbreakers for mountain warfare

2019-11-06 01:46:23 UTC  

*proof

2019-11-06 01:46:34 UTC  

aight so I'll assume that the MRA barrels + radian bolt are actually fine because the .223 rem go/no-go gauges are, well, shorter than a 5.56 fail gauge
the slight catching + friction of the bolt lugs on the chamber lugs on a .223 no-go leads me to believe that while it fails the no-go, it would "pass" both a .223 field and a 5.56 field "failure" gauge, making it safe to operate as it would likely not go into battery with an additional .003" and for sure not with the +0.01" of a 5.56 field gauge
this would make sense because, since the bolt is supposed to be mil-spec (and by all measurements the lugs are), it would be based on 5.56 gauges and is otherwise fine to operate, despite the .223 no-go failure. I also won't reload my 5.56 brass, so a short brass life means nothing to me

Now the question is my .308, which is the biggest fuck up of it all. Past return date, 25% restock fee if they do accept it, no indication of why it is not working properly. Meaning I have to drive an hour away and ask another company if I can keep fingerfucking their barrels and using the gauge dildo until I find a barrel that works with my bolt.

2019-11-06 01:46:35 UTC  

damn

2019-11-06 01:46:35 UTC  

oh really? I thought that was a big appeal to them

2019-11-06 01:46:40 UTC  

they look aesthetic

2019-11-06 01:46:46 UTC  

lmao no theyre full canvas

2019-11-06 01:46:58 UTC  

they look aesthetic but i thought they were waterproof

2019-11-06 01:47:03 UTC  

knew i could count on you guys

2019-11-06 01:47:09 UTC  

they look ehh

2019-11-06 01:47:11 UTC  

depends on the one

2019-11-06 01:47:33 UTC  

like if you do dry winter stuff you can layer a bunch of stuff under it

2019-11-06 01:47:34 UTC  

the tan and dark brown one was the colour scheme i was miring

2019-11-06 01:47:50 UTC  

maybe forest green and dark green

2019-11-06 01:47:54 UTC  

ive snowboarded in it, got really cold cause not waterproof

2019-11-06 01:48:03 UTC  

damn

2019-11-06 01:48:05 UTC  

but if they arent waterproof then they're useless to me