@rogalik but you're just in denial

soviets gave you best they have

@Mastisæg you realise that this building itself, one of the stalinist skyscrapers was based off american art deco 🤔

@rogalik I didn't imply that it's some kind of "unique Soviet architecture"

there's a demand for skyscrapers in there, it's a centre of our capital, I don't really know wahts your point

I am the greatest russophile here, but I must say that you are lying, @impertinence (or just trolling). 👌

you dont like them?

money like them

@Deus well, prove me wrong

@impertinence in denial about what

xD

I've actually seen a source on it once

not sure if I will be able to find it quickly tho

>At the same time, at the war's end, the Soviet Union adopted a "plunder policy" of physically transporting and relocating east European industrial assets to the Soviet Union.[162] Eastern Bloc states were required to provide coal, industrial equipment, technology, rolling stock and other resources to reconstruct the Soviet Union.[163] Between 1945 and 1953, the Soviets received a net transfer of resources from the rest of the Eastern Bloc under this policy of roughly $14 billion, an amount comparable to the net transfer from the United States to western Europe in the Marshall Plan.[163][164] "Reparations" included the dismantling of railways in Poland and Romanian reparations to the Soviets between 1944 and 1948 valued at $1.8 billion concurrent with the domination of SovRoms.[161]

In addition, the Soviets re-organised enterprises as joint-stock companies in which the Soviets possessed the controlling interest.[164][165] Using that control vehicle, several enterprises were required to sell products at below world prices to the Soviets, such as uranium mines in Czechoslovakia and East Germany, coal mines in Poland, and oil wells in Romania.[166]

uh ok, that was easy

oh, nice copypaste

very credible wow

are you trolling or do you seriously believe that the ussr was the on the losing side there

Btw, is a person named Tomasz Maciejczuk well known in Poland?

Katyń [*]

sources aside, it's completely irrational from the geopolitical point of view, USSR was far stronger than all the rest of the Eastern Bloc combined, it's only natural that the USSR would take the advantage

Never forget.

@Mastisæg @impertinence do you know

tomasz terka

@rogalik ussr gave to warsaw pact countries more than even russians had

ooh what

what is the second part of the sentence even supposed to mean

<:thonking:318673885497262091>

USSR gave to us only death.

👌

@Deus r u dead?

I guess it's an old stereotype that all of the Warsaw Pact countries had better living conditions than Russians had in Soviet Russia.

ussr haven't given us a shit, it was the other way around

during Congress Kingdom period Poland developed A LOT

>I guess it's an old stereotype that all of the Warsaw Pact countries had better living conditions than Russians had in Soviet Russia.
It's true for uh Estonia, Czechoslovakia and maybe a few others, that's all

And it's actually true, all Soviet citizens who were visiting Poland or Czechoslovakia or Eastern Germany thought they were in paradise.

saying USSR done more than Russian Empire is retarded

but you were always poorer

you literally have to be full on russian propaganda