i have no desire to contribute to the system

it will die and i will be on my own away from it

>it will die I swear

again

>nothing ever bad happened in histroy

how does the social democracy not work?

give me some examples where it does

Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland?

there's high growth there and they have way less income inequality https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/2014_Gini_Index_World_Map%2C_income_inequality_distribution_by_country_per_World_Bank.svg/863px-2014_Gini_Index_World_Map%2C_income_inequality_distribution_by_country_per_World_Bank.svg.png

the better question is, what DOESN'T work in the Nordic countries(regarding economy)

socialism works when you have a homogenous group as everyone is working in a collective for eachothers interests. Socialism never happened in the US outside of small scale becasuse the population was to divided and people inherently dont share interests. The tribe is always prevalent, and is one of the most basic and foundational levels of any given society. Most european countries share these characteristics atleast to some extent. Thats why socialism has been so effective in many of them. Thats the same thing hitler wanted except they introduce marxist elements of equality instead of just doing it to make the population stronger. The end result of this is things like the migrant crisis and in the long term those policies will not be sustainable as the population becomes more divided and becomes decadent through them being over reliant on these institutions which begin to work in favor of ideology instead of that country's population. I'm not against every element of social democracy, its just there is about 50% of it that goes against my entire ideological foundation. I keep bringing up environmentalism because its the perfect example, instead of simply saying moving away from fossil fuels we need to focus specifically on mass scale wind and solar energy. While in the short run and at face value these seem fine, in the long run they are worse for the environment because of the waste produced and inefficiency. This translates into nearly every policy because they focus on more conceptual things rather than whats practical.

>socialism

I haven't been advocating for any 'socialism'

`I keep bringing up environmentalism because its the perfect example, instead of simply saying moving away from fossil fuels we need to focus specifically on mass scale wind and solar energy. While in the short run and at face value these seem fine, in the long run they are worse for the environment because of the waste produced and inefficiency.`

I'm saving that

comedy gold

```I haven't been advocating for any 'socialism'```

also how do you do code

I forgot

``test``

hmm...

use ` ` `

` 3x

thats just gay

yeah

im using socialism in the modern term which is mixture of light marxism with capitalism

solar panels are already so much more efficient than they were in the past

this is how it is utilized in most political science courses

the technology is so much better already

Chinks are building massive solar farms

and no there's no more waste from these technologies are you sane?

where did you take that from?

holy fuck you dont know shit

do you know how detrimental the extraction and waste of rare earth metals like lithium are?

they are worse than oil

>all scientists shill for green energy but hey folks I say that it produces more waste <:brainlet:395711607554048000>

not to mention covering entire hectares of land with panels is bad for it to

im all for small scale solar for heating water etc

but in mass scale its shit

nuclear and hydoelectric are the best

>lithium