The only anon retarded enough to lose to Ghoul is plr but I'd say they're even.

You're no better than the people you hate, you ignore facts because they don't suit your opinion

let me finish?

No.

kys

Don't even bother typing I won't read.

so here you have an issue of interpretation, and you are in no position to claim that you have facts on your side actually, these are loose terms, but anyway even if you look up "semi-nude" so the lower boundary, google says "topless", so yeah as for me nudity is uncovered butt, genitals, female breasts, but no legs and belly ffs, no one considers bikini softcore porn here, and in the Wikipedia article you have two images included, both of them are showing nudity, none of the stuff like that would be allowed here, further by clicking on the "erotic" term in Wikipedia there are 3 pictures included all of them again are showing explicit nudity and again none of the stuff like that is ever allowed here

@Cielodiluna di Bisanzio

>deleting your own arguments

Absolute madman. <:haha:318675605233336330>

stop posting these or you lose image posting

I give you a literal definition, you say "these are loose terms" because it doesn't suit your opinion

yeah fuck off iisu youre losing image posting right

XDDDDDDDD

XDDDDDDDD

$remove 10 iisu

Command not found.

oh dog

how was it

$purge 10 iisu

The definition even says "typically" when saying "contains love making" and in the next paragraph, clearly states that "Softcore pornography ***may*** include sexual activity between two people", doesn't mean it has to

Just because the examples it gives is pictures with nudity, it doesn't make it true that it has to be nude for it to be softcore pornography

Because it literally says that it doesn't have to in its definition

The fact is that you post these pictures because of their erotic components, and that makes them softcore pornography

the "definition" in the introduction doesnt reference anything so here's my claim on this "definition" not really being so much established, if it doesn't contain nudity then what does it contain, it should give some examples

this is an ambiguous definition at the very least

Epic

by the fact that bikini images are culturally accepted here they do not belong to the softcore porn category

"if thing accepté cant bee softcore pron" <:brainlet:395711607554048000>

and yeah we are posting girls because we are sexually attracted to them I dont see anything wrong with that tho

stop objectifying women

>"if thing accepté cant bee softcore pron" <:brainlet:395711607554048000>
porn doesn't belong to the public sphere, bikini here does therefore bikini is not porn

also I think this whole bikini issue is what neko said when she filled her complaints like underwear not ok but bikini ok

@ストーリーライター

tell them something now those jihadists want to ban fucking bikini

"if thing is pron but then peepee say "i acecpt it" it becum noit poren anymreo" <:brainlet:395711607554048000>

yeah my peenie likes this as well do you propose to ban this sort of images?

Well id ban it tho.

do you propose to include it in the definition of softcore porn

Cus u dont know how it feels when u r outside with tons of almost naked girls pics.

I spoke to u about this once. NSFW isnt only naked body.