Even his nick says Gay is ök.

circling around because in your country women will get beheaded if they wear bikini i suppose

<:haha:318675605233336330>

Yeah cool unrelated argument

theres no nudity theres no even underwear whats softcore about pictures posted in here?

if you say a girl in bikin is softcore no one will agree with that

idk what I'm doing on this server.

Semi-nudity is still softcore porn you rart

You're just ignoring what I'm explaining, what's the point

you're just ignoring the fact no one considers bikini softcore

I don't give a shit about someone considering it softcore porn, by definition, it is softcore pornography

also this dicussion will be vague because you didn't even provide any examples

Are you somehow unable to understand what I'm referencing when I'm saying you posting "bikini girls" and "in today's logs"

>I don't give a shit about someone considering it softcore porn, by definition, it is softcore pornography
Pfff stop blaming the apparent low quality of this conversation on me if you "dont give a shit" then

I don't consider bikini softcore but I'm with Gökay just because it hurts to look at how retarded Ghoul acts in any discussion.

That makes it 2:1.

You're the one making it low quality because you're ignoring literal facts

bring me a definition of softcore porn you're referencing

all examples of softcore porn I've seen have nothing to do with girls in bikini

Okay, from your precious wikipedia:

Softcore pornography or softcore porn is commercial still photography or film that has a pornographic or erotic component. It is less sexually graphic and intrusive than hardcore pornography. It typically contains nude or semi-nude actors involved in love scenes, and is intended to be sexually arousing and aesthetically beautiful.

@rogalik How does it feel to lose every fucking argument even if you're the right one and have a decisive advantage in the beginning? <:haha:318675605233336330>

neither softcore porn or semi-nude are defined by dictionaries

Lol

The only anon retarded enough to lose to Ghoul is plr but I'd say they're even.

You're no better than the people you hate, you ignore facts because they don't suit your opinion

let me finish?

No.

kys

Don't even bother typing I won't read.

so here you have an issue of interpretation, and you are in no position to claim that you have facts on your side actually, these are loose terms, but anyway even if you look up "semi-nude" so the lower boundary, google says "topless", so yeah as for me nudity is uncovered butt, genitals, female breasts, but no legs and belly ffs, no one considers bikini softcore porn here, and in the Wikipedia article you have two images included, both of them are showing nudity, none of the stuff like that would be allowed here, further by clicking on the "erotic" term in Wikipedia there are 3 pictures included all of them again are showing explicit nudity and again none of the stuff like that is ever allowed here

@Cielodiluna di Bisanzio

>deleting your own arguments

Absolute madman. <:haha:318675605233336330>

stop posting these or you lose image posting

I give you a literal definition, you say "these are loose terms" because it doesn't suit your opinion

yeah fuck off iisu youre losing image posting right

XDDDDDDDD

XDDDDDDDD

$remove 10 iisu

Command not found.