right but how and why would they engage with a much larger and better armed force like american civilians

thats the point

they wont

as long as we stay armed

they dont want to kil us

they want to control

>right but how and why would they engage with a much larger and better armed force like american civilians

idk how and why would they engage with civilians(dont get what you mean by "better armed")

but you apparently need protection from your own military

as you say

80 million armed americans

300+ million guns

retard

more than any other armed force to have ever existed

no

your own army is like 100x stronger than your civilians lel

how

there arent 80 million army men

??

wtf are you talking about

you admitted back then that civilians actually have no chance against a real military and now you are saying they actually would ?

??

what

if they nuked us we would all die
gov and civ alike

how is that winning

do 80 million armed americans constitute a real military power according to you?

because they dont and you dont even need the american military to pacify those, far less powerful armies would do, the thing is you only have guns, while they have aircraft, tanks, bigger guns, rockets, drones, etc. also when civilians are armed then they are not treated as civilisans of course so in the case of engagement the army is free to just nuke the shit out of you

why the fuck would they nuke us

they would die too

idk

you are the one claiming that you need to defend against them

not against nukes

>they would die too
by nuking I'm not saying nuclear

common artillery will do

but how would they even be able to kill us all
makes no sense

do you realize how massive the us is

idk have you seen how the american military was mowing the iraqi army for example?

no they wouldnt be able to KILL you all

yeah and it was a disaster for american military
never a clean victory

a disaster?

I'm talking about the invasion

it was clean and incredibly fast