Message from @cockslammer
Discord ID: 567130106250788904
ok let me back up
80m guerrilas?
hang on
so just listen for a moment
To what
the powers that be want to control us
that is their purpose
in order to control a population you need massive police presence
now for an unarmed population this is easy to acheive
keep them down with fear
they wont fight back so you can make whatever policies you want
now imagine an armed populice though
you send a team of officers to arrest someone for insulting a politician
and now you dont know wether they will succeed or if all officers are gonna come back in body bags because the citizen was dug in and armed to the teeth
you cant oppress an armed peopple
thats the point
right you need not explaining me thats its harder to enforce on an armed populace
right
its an obviousness
this is why our arms are so important to us
we have a very defined and explicit set of rights that our gov recognizes that was put in place by we the people
and the only way to ensure the gov respects those promises is with superior firepower
im not debating the guns here I dont really care this discussion started off with you saying that you need a protection against your own military
which is quite ridiculous
the military industrial complex
the gov
we stay free by our own hands
>and the only way to ensure the gov respects those promises is with superior firepower
you dont have a superior firepower to the gov, and no its not the only way at all
and an added bonus is that when jamal and deshawn break in to steal your tv you can just ventilate them instead of cowering and waiting for daddy gov to come and save us
dude what do you think firepower means
we have 300+ million guns as a low estimate
also how else would yuou ensure the gov respect your rights
asking nicely?
>also how else would yuou ensure the gov respect your rights
asking nicely?
ooh, have you ever wondered how it is in countries besides your own kek?
there are many countries without the armed populace in which the goverments respect the citizens rights
so it can't be the only way
by the benevolence of the gov?
and at any point the gov could just decide to revoke them
the guns is a tradition, there's no real reason to have them really
have you not been paying attention
ive given you several reasons why they are necessary
>by the benevolence of the gov?
and at any point the gov could just decide to revoke them
somehow it doesn't happen in those countries I wonder...
which countries are you speaking of
how it is there are dozens of perfectly free countries in the world without the armed populace