Message from @Hadrian
Discord ID: 407340813048217600
fixed spelling and resized
I love this
Good job @RagBat#9038
LoS and TWP alliance is strong and good, as it ought to be.
Thx bb
Is LoS our, dare I say it, greatest ally? 🤔
if the <@&274905555318079488> want me to create prop I'll happily do it, just lmk what stuff you want
we need more anti-labor union stuff
labor unions are fine, at least in theory
not in my opinion
they're always hives of leftism.
and they're antithetical to the National Socialist state
The National Socialist state is the labor union of the Aryan Worker
TWP is pro-worker, so anti-union rhetoric is counter intuitive to our platform.
The Party should be the union
We don't have state control, so that isn't possible, at the moment.
we don't have union control, either. many, many union workers are leftists, especially the leadership
Like I said, the idea of them is good
Most rank and file union workers are on our side, the union oligarchy are the ones who are PoS.
and i don't think it's wrong or unfair if a company hired non-unionized workers. why should the union picket? To me, there's no quarrel if the men being hired are our blood. I believe in free enterprise, so long as there are controls
LOL muh free enterprise...now that is contradictory to NS.
no it's not
The whole point of having a union is because the company can't fire everybody, they'd have nobody to run the place
there's a difference between high finance and hiring a non-unionized construction crew
If they can freely hire non-union workers, then the union can't protect anyone
so what?
the whole point of unions is to protect workers
so their version of protecting people is throwing tantrums if someone wants to hire someone else who's unaffiliated? The state should provide protections for workers
Yes, free enterprise = capitalism.
I consider myself a mixture of distributism and corporatism, which incorporates a level of "free enterprise", but not without the level of protection that worker syndicates and guilds provide.
picketing their kin for living their own lives is wrong. if i want to hire a team of non-unionized construction workers, i'll do it. Money is going to White families and I get the work I want done. Laws will be in place to protect people. I'm allowed to hire who I think will best serve me for the money i'm doling out
If companies can hire outside the union, they can diminish the protection the union offers until its meaningless
Unions striking to prevent that is working as designed
"living their own lives"...the people live for the nation and their folk, not to appease their own individual needs.
so companies should be bound by law to hire only people who join unions?
only in companies where unions are already established
Bro, this is a socialist group, not a capitalist one...you are arguing for money, individualism, and capitalism...you are not going to get far with these arguments in TWP.
If companies would do what's in the best interests of the people, it wouldn't be necessary
The state should be the only thing a worker needs