Message from @John Mosby

Discord ID: 407340502975774720


2018-01-26 02:10:52 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399385196140691468/406269732744986644/banner.jpg

2018-01-26 02:28:12 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399385196140691468/406274093181042697/1488.jpg

2018-01-26 02:28:20 UTC  

fixed spelling and resized

2018-01-26 17:15:22 UTC  

I love this

2018-01-26 17:15:31 UTC  

Good job @RagBat#9038

2018-01-26 17:15:57 UTC  

LoS and TWP alliance is strong and good, as it ought to be.

2018-01-26 18:12:56 UTC  

Thx bb

2018-01-26 20:01:52 UTC  

Is LoS our, dare I say it, greatest ally? 🤔

2018-01-26 20:14:14 UTC  

if the <@&274905555318079488> want me to create prop I'll happily do it, just lmk what stuff you want

2018-01-29 00:17:43 UTC  

we need more anti-labor union stuff

2018-01-29 00:46:38 UTC  

labor unions are fine, at least in theory

2018-01-29 01:02:55 UTC  

not in my opinion

2018-01-29 01:03:11 UTC  

they're always hives of leftism.

2018-01-29 01:03:32 UTC  

and they're antithetical to the National Socialist state

2018-01-29 01:04:47 UTC  

The National Socialist state is the labor union of the Aryan Worker

2018-01-29 01:05:03 UTC  

TWP is pro-worker, so anti-union rhetoric is counter intuitive to our platform.

2018-01-29 01:05:24 UTC  

The Party should be the union

2018-01-29 01:05:43 UTC  

We don't have state control, so that isn't possible, at the moment.

2018-01-29 01:06:34 UTC  

we don't have union control, either. many, many union workers are leftists, especially the leadership

2018-01-29 01:06:48 UTC  

Like I said, the idea of them is good

2018-01-29 01:06:57 UTC  

Even if most modern unions are bad

2018-01-29 01:07:41 UTC  

Most rank and file union workers are on our side, the union oligarchy are the ones who are PoS.

2018-01-29 01:08:20 UTC  

and i don't think it's wrong or unfair if a company hired non-unionized workers. why should the union picket? To me, there's no quarrel if the men being hired are our blood. I believe in free enterprise, so long as there are controls

2018-01-29 01:08:45 UTC  

LOL muh free enterprise...now that is contradictory to NS.

2018-01-29 01:08:54 UTC  

no it's not

2018-01-29 01:09:11 UTC  

The whole point of having a union is because the company can't fire everybody, they'd have nobody to run the place

2018-01-29 01:09:33 UTC  

there's a difference between high finance and hiring a non-unionized construction crew

2018-01-29 01:09:41 UTC  

If they can freely hire non-union workers, then the union can't protect anyone

2018-01-29 01:10:46 UTC  

so what?

2018-01-29 01:11:04 UTC  

the whole point of unions is to protect workers

2018-01-29 01:12:12 UTC  

so their version of protecting people is throwing tantrums if someone wants to hire someone else who's unaffiliated? The state should provide protections for workers

2018-01-29 01:12:30 UTC  

Yes, free enterprise = capitalism.

I consider myself a mixture of distributism and corporatism, which incorporates a level of "free enterprise", but not without the level of protection that worker syndicates and guilds provide.

2018-01-29 01:14:23 UTC  

picketing their kin for living their own lives is wrong. if i want to hire a team of non-unionized construction workers, i'll do it. Money is going to White families and I get the work I want done. Laws will be in place to protect people. I'm allowed to hire who I think will best serve me for the money i'm doling out

2018-01-29 01:14:39 UTC  

If companies can hire outside the union, they can diminish the protection the union offers until its meaningless

2018-01-29 01:15:05 UTC  

Unions striking to prevent that is working as designed

2018-01-29 01:15:17 UTC  

"living their own lives"...the people live for the nation and their folk, not to appease their own individual needs.

2018-01-29 01:15:38 UTC  

so companies should be bound by law to hire only people who join unions?

2018-01-29 01:16:15 UTC  

only in companies where unions are already established