Cant be a tsar without anyone holding the title

<:duhva:608723855460139153>

especially since the rurikids died out

do you understand that roman empire was technically a republic until the end?

like, emperor is not the king

<:duhva:608723855460139153>

Even if Russia had barely any claim to be the third Rome, that claim was obliterated by Lenin

hahahahAHAHAH this is you

"Procession of Virgins" <:haha2:607674493376397355>

senate existed until the end of it

Their claim came through marriages with the byzantine emperors

not thorugh the senate

<:duhva:608723855460139153>

>Their claim came through marriages with the byzantine emperors
and then anyone can make that claim

>he's making fun of biblical stories

whoever who married into the byzantine family

kek

if theyre alive yeah

which they arent

@rogalik well, you didn't read my posts then

Byzantine emperor gave his daughter to the Seljuk emperor to secure peace

Seljuks 3rd Rome confirmed

seljuks suck cock

reminder that the western imperial title

<:haHAA:320314457500811264>

was recognised as equal

by Constantinople

therefore, germany is the third rome

>these pathetic claims

kek

yours is equally as pathetic

hei

Moscow is the Third Rome and there will never be Fourth

@fitte hi

my claims are based on roman christian philosophy, yours on some pagan cucks inventions

har du en fitte

nei

@rogalik hi

```In 972, at the end of his last campaign in Italy, Otto I took a momentous step. Having conquered the Byzantines’ Italian territories, he offered to return them in exchange for the mutual recognition of titles. He was to defer to the ‘Empire of the Romans’ if they would recognize his own, equal, imperial status. The agreement was sealed by the marriage of Otto’s son to Theophano, daughter of the previous Byzantine Emperor, Romanus II. From then on, there were to be two empires.```

hvorfor ikke

har du det