Its just speech

it would apply if someone came and started screeching about race war and all

What if i wanna do that

Ive done that a bunch of times

Wtf is this new rule about

we advertise domek as a no-pol zone now

dont want to have people with nazi swastikas and hitlers on avatar

and they happen actually

Kinda gay tbqh

As of now it's 5:3, so it passes.

I formally submit a motion to reward the newly implemented rule to include the outlawing of far-left ideology promotion along with far-right

im for it when you prove that its a problem in this community or on 4chan

its non-existant

that addition would not have any merit

It's irrelevant wether this is a problem here or not

alright then you admit its non-existant

yes

eot

I formally submit a motion to reward the newly implemented rule to include the outlawing of far-left ideology promotion along with far-right

and that cannot be allowed to process because this rule does not have any relevance, all rules must have a purpose

the purpose is to stop the formation of far-left groups and propaganda in domek in the future

and there is a whole different issue with this, but as long as the rule is absurd there's no even talking about it

You admitted yourself no one in domek indulges in far-right propaganda

so your own rule is as "absurd" as my proposal

you are a coward

I formally submit a motion to reward the newly implemented rule to include the outlawing of far-left ideology promotion along with far-right

no one currently but it has happened multiple times and its a common occurence on 4chan, therefore the rule is relevant

>I formally submit a motion to reward the newly implemented rule to include the outlawing of far-left ideology promotion along with far-right
dismissed, the motion doesn't have sense, the addition would be void

Fascist

>the purpose is to stop the formation of far-left groups and propaganda in domek in the future
do you have any evidence indicating that possibility?

leftypol exists

not that i believe we need evidence indicating that possibility to validate the rule

its a rule-making principle, we don't add void rules, every single rule covers something independent and relevant

Sieg heil

How about just fucking banning ideological extremism

coward

no need of that, theres no danger from "ideological extremism" as a whole

Fascist coward

likewise not gonna add a rule that islamic fundamentalism is banned, theres no need to

>supports communism and islam

yeah no surprise there