and I think that sacrificing a Socialist goal just to prevent hierarchy is weird

No no

In the sense that central authority is needed for defense, for instance

Because capitalism is inherently hierarchical

Yes of course

I know it is ahahaha

I’m saying

@yung the free territory had the voluntary insurrectionary army

Yes but how much did it last?

They were destroyed by the red army

And you think the red army were the only ones capable of stopping them?

No

The red army is the strongest

which is what I mean. You can’t be attempting Socialism and not have strong means by which to protect yourself

Well the free territory was small and the red army was colossal

no no of course I get that

Not to mention the 3rd reich fell to the Soviets

They had some good generals

I’m just saying that completely decentralized systems of organization cannot stretch far

I’m skeptical of the idea that there could ever be an anarchist experiment larger than say Italy

which is decentralized throughout and survive foreign imperialism

What about the pkk

Not big but

They're doing their share

I have solidarity for the pkk

but they are not yet quite Socialist

they are extremely close to it

You are all gross fascists

Disgusting

Im an anarchist

Thats the same

National anarchist lol

Anarchism is libertarianism for subhumans

No u

Also everything you just said is uninformed crap

you mean right wing libertarianism is stolen real libertarianism

The third reich did not fall to the soviets

@supermodel ruben no the nazis won

Capitalism is not inherently hierarchicl

Go back to fucking high school

Isiot