Message from @buyXRBpls

Discord ID: 431979896206524417


2018-04-07 00:51:17 UTC  

But that died earlier

2018-04-07 00:51:18 UTC  

L

2018-04-07 00:51:41 UTC  

To be fair Yugoslavia actually did it

2018-04-07 00:51:55 UTC  

If you need to put the power in the hands of the people, a small government is the way to go.

2018-04-07 00:51:58 UTC  

btw pre khrushchev SU—-> Socialist

2018-04-07 00:52:03 UTC  

don’t @ me

2018-04-07 00:52:34 UTC  
2018-04-07 00:52:42 UTC  

small government when you’re a socialist revolution targeted by most countries combined

2018-04-07 00:52:48 UTC  

Stalin reforms

2018-04-07 00:52:49 UTC  

good idea

2018-04-07 00:52:51 UTC  

Were

2018-04-07 00:52:52 UTC  

Shit

2018-04-07 00:52:54 UTC  

Die

2018-04-07 00:52:58 UTC  

Having an all-powerful government run by a select few people like with ML just defeats the purpose of power to the people.

2018-04-07 00:53:19 UTC  

“all powerful”

2018-04-07 00:53:20 UTC  

I’m a filthy capitalist and I can still see that.

2018-04-07 00:53:43 UTC  

people in the party has literally no legal right above any person in the SU

2018-04-07 00:53:49 UTC  

Mad cause true

2018-04-07 00:53:52 UTC  

U bad

2018-04-07 00:53:52 UTC  

not even one

2018-04-07 00:53:53 UTC  

L

2018-04-07 00:54:06 UTC  

@buyXRBpls Finally, something we can agree with amirite

2018-04-07 00:54:22 UTC  

and Stalin was really not consistently the deciding man

2018-04-07 00:54:34 UTC  

it wasn’t as hierarchical as you think it was

2018-04-07 00:54:34 UTC  

Idc

2018-04-07 00:54:36 UTC  

L

2018-04-07 00:54:44 UTC  

Tankie BTFO'D

2018-04-07 00:54:56 UTC  

I said a select few, not a single man.

2018-04-07 00:55:10 UTC  

Let’s keep hoping to build Socialism on a hill and act like capitalists are not gonna crush you

2018-04-07 00:55:26 UTC  

Democratic Centralism, look up

2018-04-07 00:55:51 UTC  

At least the capitalists aren’t preachy about being capitalists <:bour:313709044957315082>

2018-04-07 00:55:58 UTC  

If it resembles China's current system then I am mostly ok with it

2018-04-07 00:56:16 UTC  

In theory

2018-04-07 00:56:16 UTC  

I’m fine with China too, yeah.

2018-04-07 00:56:18 UTC  

At least

2018-04-07 00:56:29 UTC  

Socialism with chinese characteristics is NOT SOCIALISM

2018-04-07 00:56:34 UTC  

On an economic level, at least.

2018-04-07 00:56:36 UTC  

Well economically

2018-04-07 00:56:42 UTC  

Their government is fine

2018-04-07 00:56:45 UTC  

Their foreign policy is too aggressive.

2018-04-07 00:56:54 UTC  

Dare I say, *Imperialist.*