I mean in defense of bandit even if he didn’t use APA citations and provide links to peer reviewed articles, between friends, and in the interest of time, his explanation isn’t a terrible one. It’s just a brief informal one.

He is right though, should have looked further into it so I was giving out more accurate info, though by my friend’s response he seems for the government disarming citizens

Most eurocucks are

With the explanation “The government could fucking delete you with a drone lol”

All the more reason to make javelins accessible on the civilian market

Guerillas the world over would like a word

Does he realize who actually operates those drones? Because I’m buddies with a few drone operators

What’s the difference between an orphanage and an enemy compound?

15W’s lol

And what

I don’t know, I just fly the drone

Top tier

Thank you thank you

I tried explaining that to him, it was like talking to a brick wall lol

Until I can own an 88mm Flak cannon to defend myself against intruders from the sky the 2A is being infringed. Property law IS written as such that you own everything below you in like a cone shape right to the center of the earth and likewise to the sky

So if I see a plane that is in my airspace I should be allowed to delete it

Well regardless I’m gonna run for president and my campaign will be based solely on Flak cannons

Tell me I wouldn’t win the vote in at least 3 states

You’d win Arkansas

To be fair I’m not the best informant/debater. I’m just a welder/fabricator that’s done a little heavy equipment operation

Guam and Puerto Rico?

:p

@MrBlack will do after work

What’s his credentials @MrBlack

Also link sources In general

But what are his stances on Flak Cannons ?

Remind me to source you a flak cannon for your Bday lol

Let freedom crank

That's kinda a big difference lol

The way I’ve always seen it is there can be 2 sources from which threats to liberty will come. The US government and foreign governments. And since it’s our rights we oughta be able to defend them. Thus any means of defense we can have we should be allowed to possess.

Again

Threats foreign and domestic

If every one is strapped than less people will get clapped

Agreed ^

Really the biggest issue plaguing is is the lack of comprehensive mental health care in place for the country. That and proper widely accessible training will create stable, responsible and competent gun owning citizens

The Texas church shooting disproves that @MrBlack

An armed society is a polite society

A gun is a tool like any other. Because I was allowed to use a table saw I was shown how to use it. I was supervised while using it and once I was competent I was left to my own devices

I'm pretty sure in the middle ages if a crazy fucker was running around town swinging a mace he'd get clapped by some villager with an axe. A little archaic comparison but accurately nonetheless.

Same in the 1800s

Okay so what would happen then?