Message from @BabygottBach

Discord ID: 468808599947182091


2018-07-17 15:53:40 UTC  

<:GWcfcThonk:357907199928041473>

2018-07-17 15:54:15 UTC  

because the goods have value not determined by labor

2018-07-17 15:54:25 UTC  

like time preference

2018-07-17 15:54:39 UTC  

what do you mean "have value"

2018-07-17 15:54:49 UTC  

Have use? have utility?

2018-07-17 15:54:52 UTC  

they are worth more labor currency

2018-07-17 15:55:00 UTC  

you pay more

2018-07-17 15:55:00 UTC  

What do you mean "worth"?

2018-07-17 15:55:05 UTC  

dawg

2018-07-17 15:55:13 UTC  

fucking commie semantic games

2018-07-17 15:55:15 UTC  

to whom?

2018-07-17 15:55:23 UTC  

To whom are they worth more?

2018-07-17 15:55:24 UTC  

to someone that wants it

2018-07-17 15:56:23 UTC  

I don't want it at all, thus they are worth zero to me. So are they worthless?

Someone else may sell his soul for them, so they are worth everything for him. So are they priceless?

2018-07-17 15:57:03 UTC  

if someone wants it

2018-07-17 15:57:06 UTC  

it has value

2018-07-17 15:57:17 UTC  

if no one wants to pay for ite it doesnt have value

2018-07-17 15:57:20 UTC  

The only way the idea of what something is worth is if you ask what it is worth to the whole market,

2018-07-17 15:57:31 UTC  

sure

2018-07-17 15:57:51 UTC  

Economics isn't about what some individual wants or thinks, but about the economy as a whole

2018-07-17 15:58:00 UTC  

micro vs macro

2018-07-17 15:58:02 UTC  

whats your point

2018-07-17 15:58:04 UTC  

If yo

2018-07-17 15:58:30 UTC  

If we are talking about the economy as a whole, that's where LTV applies. Its a macro level theory, talking about aggregates

2018-07-17 15:58:38 UTC  

LTV doesn't apply on the micro level

2018-07-17 15:58:55 UTC  

LTV isn't some theory about the psychological make of individual wants and desires

2018-07-17 15:59:31 UTC  

It assumes that people have all sorts of needs as a given, and does not seek to explain those needs.

2018-07-17 16:00:20 UTC  

"A commodity is, in the first place, an object outside us, a thing that by its properties satisfies human wants of some sort or another. The nature of such wants, whether, for instance, they spring from the stomach or from fancy, makes no difference.[2] Neither are we here concerned to know how the object satisfies these wants, whether directly as means of subsistence, or indirectly as means of production. "

2018-07-17 16:00:56 UTC  

you arent really saying anything

2018-07-17 16:01:33 UTC  

the value of money comes from work

2018-07-17 16:01:42 UTC  

I think that modern economics masquerades as a psychological science sometimes, trying to give an account of individual behavior and actions

2018-07-17 16:02:01 UTC  

but commodities cost more than the labor put into them

2018-07-17 16:02:20 UTC  

A commodity is made up of labor and other commodities

2018-07-17 16:02:20 UTC  

so yeah its a part of the cost but its not the value

2018-07-17 16:02:30 UTC  

like time

2018-07-17 16:02:37 UTC  

those other commodities are also made up of labor and other commodities

2018-07-17 16:02:40 UTC  

and so on and son

2018-07-17 16:02:50 UTC  

until you get to commodities that are made up of nothing BUT labor

2018-07-17 16:03:04 UTC  

thats a stretch

2018-07-17 16:03:10 UTC  

and its inconsequential

2018-07-17 16:03:36 UTC  

because price is what matters