So far I don't see differences of the interest between you and workers as your profit rate is not very high.

That means class of proletariat does not have a heavy contradiction with your personal business and you personally.

15 a month is still ok wage for management in my opinion

If you made 100k and paid them 10/h

That would be a strong problem in the eyes of the proletariat

So far we try to attract petite bourgeoisie that do not have a heavy contradiction on our side

100k in that situation is ok wage

For a good manager

I think

If managers do all job for you

And you just cut the profit

?

It becomes a problem when you have a title on getting money out of labour and you don't have to do anything or your profit is much higher than of the needs of a management.

Because is a possession of a title of power that grants you the right to own and ripe while doing nothing.

Is like feudalism

Lord has workers and makes them work on a filed

While just collecting money through firepower

And brutality

Management providing jobs

You have a right to invest through a title.

EDP CONFIRMED /OURGUY/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA9_b7EeYb4

Possession of a capital grants you a right to invest.

There is no clear line. Anybody who side with us, be it noble like Lenin or Dzezhinski, capitalist like Engels or Trotsky has an opportunity to transit to a new society without loss.

Anybody who is against us must give it all to proletariat by the means of force.

Is a subjective line

Not an indicator of a profit

He shouldn't be taken down if he sides with revolution

Is a subjective decision

Engels had a factory

Trotsky a fabric

Lenin a title

Same way Napoleon did not take down Monarchists that sided with him

But embraced them

And cherished

If they sided with capitalist revolution

capitalism>leftism

foreva

corporatism>capitalism>leftsm

Well, a worker that gets 10/h and has to pay 3k for the rent to the landlord while he does nothing might have a problem.

no