Message from @Stahlschabe
Discord ID: 506087695664283648
if hitler was jewish why did he like islam so much
In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.
^
And the abolition of this state of things is called by the bourgeois, abolition of individuality and freedom! And rightly so. The abolition of bourgeois individuality, bourgeois independence, and bourgeois freedom is undoubtedly aimed at.
By freedom is meant, under the present bourgeois conditions of production, free trade, free selling and buying.
Ok mate I don't care if hitler was even black
Race doesn't matter
Freedom of moral responsibility so to say.
oh now you dont care all of a sudden
I never did?
Its not about “race“
I made a joke saying hitler was a Jew
weird how it works
But reactionary culture.
From the moment when labour can no longer be converted into capital, money, or rent, into a social power capable of being monopolised, i.e., from the moment when individual property can no longer be transformed into bourgeois property, into capital, from that moment, you say, individuality vanishes.
Ideally such regressive strains of thought should be stamped out under responsible leadership.
As the chinese communist party is doing with the uighurs
It has been objected that upon the abolition of private property, all work will cease, and universal laziness will overtake us.
According to this, bourgeois society ought long ago to have gone to the dogs through sheer idleness; for those of its members who work, acquire nothing, and those who acquire anything do not work.
And how tito tried with the serbs, but ultimately failed as he strayed to far from the soviet union.
so you said race doesnt exist so when you said "hitler was a jew" you meant he practiced judaism .show me those sources babe i want to have a laugh and want to see you continue to expose yourself @Borzo
Mate I was making fun of your argument when I said hitler was a Jew
You claim everything is Jewish
no you wasnt
okay whats your problems with individuality
The whole of this objection is but another expression of the tautology: that there can no longer be any wage-labour when there is no longer any capital.
But don’t wrangle with us so long as you apply, to our intended abolition of bourgeois property, the standard of your bourgeois notions of freedom, culture, law, &c.
As Atheism is one of the necessary conditions for communism to take shape.
Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class made into a law for all, a will whose essential character and direction are determined by the economical conditions of existence of your class.
I dont see how reactionarys would object to it if they only define themselves over their adversity to judaism.
Which in itself is just another opiate to be dispelled in the end.
yeah nice big words but having no freedom sucks, and if you want that you can have that now too
The selfish misconception that induces you to transform into eternal laws of nature and of reason, the social forms springing from your present mode of production and form of property – historical relations that rise and disappear in the progress of production – this misconception you share with every ruling class that has preceded you.
What you see clearly in the case of ancient property, what you admit in the case of feudal property, you are of course forbidden to admit in the case of your own bourgeois form of property.
you just want to trick people into believing this jewish myth of hitler being jewish or any of the main leaders of the third reich . because you want it to be on a even field where communism and the ussr is a jewish creation(which it was and is in reality) and also fascism and nahtzee germany being a jewish creation (which it wasnt and isnt)
You must, therefore, confess that by “individual” you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and made impossible. @Jannik.exe
you basically want both to be equally bad when thats impossible or trick people into believing this horse shoe theory hoax
>we have to kill everyone that wont play ball
>for the good of the people of course
call me crazy but i dont like that