Does that make sense?

@Borzo you are the absolute unit, very cool

Nobody is being exploited in this scenario

okay, but having to work at the sole discretion of somebody who nominally claims ownership over the workplace versus starving seems like a lesser of two evils scenario

Better dead than red

kys

Now instead of using burgers as money, we use something that has greater utility value that can be exchanged for anything 💰

So it makes life easier and more convenient

my counterargument still applies, dude

Die then @Buy me a pc

In free market capitalism, this trade principle is applied across the board so everyone gains in value including in the workplace.

What if

I ping every comrade

So they can yeet erisan

working at the sole discretion of the bougeoisie is preferable to dying, but neither is good, you have given no rebuttal to this

@Borzo fuck you

Starve to death first

Who should be rewarded? The people who labour and create the product and actually create the wealth, or some guy who owns private property and does basically nothing?

Me.

@Buy me a pc

your workers are worth more than you @Buy me a pc

@ᵈˢʳ✪ no they aren’t.

We are all equal

No we aren’t

Even commies agree

But all his workers combined are more important than him

We aren't

But we should be

That's what we need to change

sup borzo

Although in terms of importance, workers are definitely more important

Ey @ᵈˢʳ✪

yes they are. workers are among the factors of production, capitalists reap the lion's share and divest for accumulation of capital, but otherwise participate in no meaningful way to production, capitalists are literally freeloaders

labour creates everything

even automation

Labour is the most important commodity

^

but capitalists take advantage of it

No they don’t

the labour of others is used to perpetuate the existence of a societal parasite