Message from @ashoka
Discord ID: 553063786286809118
Why do you think that is how the modern world should be? Are we not sustainable enough that we need slaves? Really?
a bunch of unpaid workers means that none of us will have to do work
and money that could have went to paying workers can instead go to more taxes
and then we can afford ubi
And you want that? Without motivated workers, where will our world be
unlimited bimoney inyears
Will never develop
we juts get all the free time and shit to develop ideas
be more chill
we have freedom to do aynthing since the government will fund us money
fuck, you can even work with the slaves if u want to
Yes we do that now, I think that we need a better labor climate than actually getting slaves, because you know, morals...
you know aristophanes?
No I donโt.
this is the ideal society
described by praxagora
true communism can only be achieved with the use of slaves
But communism of the past isnโt appropriate for today.
#killallwiggers
communism is more important than ever with the falling rate of profit
gommunism
killz
3 trillion
Yes but. Not the communist like it was back decades ago.
youre referring to marxism-leninism?
yeah im not a leninist
Idk what it is even called now
its called "authoritarian socialism" by some niggas
Yes, although as everything, it has different forms. Idealist or Materialist.
Yes.
materialism is retarded
the idea that only the material affects me therefore only the material matters is dumb
I think an idealist form of an authoritarian socialism must follow the left-wing authority in socialism.
Agreed but retarded wouldnโt be the word
super retarded might be
I just donโt like it or agree with it thatโs all
the main justification for materialism is that a person doesn't believe in that which doesn't have observable or measurable properties. hence a materialist doesn't believe in supernatural beings or separate mental substances. and yet for there to be observation in the first place, there has to be perception, and perception is by definition a mental process. the very starting point of the materialist position is a mental event, and the position that "I only believe in that which I can observe" can lead at best (from the materialist viewpoint) to a Kantian Phenomena/Noumena dualism, and at worst to a Berkeleyan "all is in the mind" idealism. hence materialism refutes itself by the very fact that it requires an idealist starting point.
Science already capable to go further without idealism at all.