Message from @n0ne0ther
Discord ID: 651436782554185748
I'm not saying you are wrong
I'm not 100% either way.
just thinking that maybe considering the costs of long wars it might not be that farfetched
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were different bombs as well, so I dunno how much diff that makes.
yeah they were smaller , and pure fission
I don't think the middle east would calm down just because we nuke Iran though.
pretty small compared to what the huge 80s bombs
but you could absolutely make smaller cleaner bombs that would erase a whole city and force a country into submission
Might aswell tomahawk Tehran's higher ups.
true
That's what they did in Iraq.
problem with that
Very effective.
smaller hits
Yea, that's the goal.
just create martyrs
People care about casualties.
lol
you end up with even more radical groups
what i meant to say was that there's something to be said about shock and awe
Just like iraq and Syria
exactly thats been arguably worse
Tribes rule over the middle east.
I say let the tribes rule themselves.
like whats happened in IRAK, that was exactly why the Hussein Regime was put in place in the first place
They weaker than way anyways
Hussain was one tribe having power over everyone else too bne fair.
It seems to be that way in all the middle eastern countries the dictators tribe is always the ruling class.
gadaffi was like that as well.
Imagine if all the tribes had tiny countries with very little power.
That be great.
Seperate but equal.
lol
They're probably still fight.
How's this not going to spike up prices, gov. Dependency
Germany is in a pretty crappy spot for renewables.
even their immediate neighbors are in crappy spots, so they can't just buy from them