A dictated economy, but by one instead of thirty people.

@DexterMaul his reply is very good indeed

@Reprehensibletrash Hierarchy is intrinsic to the human condition.

Fuck Boris Johnson. Thanks to his deal, Britain will actually require a war to break free of EU control

@Seven Proxies then so is classism, making it a ridiculous hill to stand on

@Reprehensibletrash im hoping he grows some balls and just says "fuck off" to the EU.

but you can't trust a tory..which is why i voted for an independent candidate

even if voting is fucking pointless

Personally, I don't want equality, nor do I want the modern day "capitalism," with china buying out governments worldwide

globalism is cancer, we need some protectionism

@Kealor Yeah but the free market usually maintain better health when the entrepeneurs are competing against eachother rather than trying to sic the working class to compete against eachother.

They want market shares. But the people in the working class aren't a threat to their position (barring the socialist firebrands) they don't have the vision or ideas of becoming entrepeneurs themselves. That's why they choose to work for others. So when the entrepeneurs are fucking their workers over for the sake of saving a buck, all it does is create more socialist firebrands and the class divides spiral out of control.

there's nothing wrong with nations trading, as we've always done, but it has to be done in moderation...

too much of anything is bad for you

@Saul in my country, the CIA basically just uses the polls to track where the majority put their faith. It's not a vote, but a way of confirming which foreskin golem our people will accept as leader

They're figureheads at best

Mosca and Pareto were right

@Reprehensibletrash tbf, had Hitler not been as firebrand as he was he could've probably put pressure on poland via diplomacy to give up/cede danzig at least

@Reprehensibletrash Cia is a American thing.

hail Boris Johnson!

You mean secret service or some shit.

@Seven Proxies the only socialism is national socialism. What's happening in Europe has confirmed this on every level, especially with the Denmark study on diversity

central intelligence agency

@Saul Ikr??? He nailed her.

@Seven Proxies egoistic struggles between worker/owner will always exist, it wouldn't be healthy for workers to be completely unaware of this. Im jsut saying it shouldnt become pathlogical

@DexterMaul you nailed her? what brand nail gun did you use?

@Saul I agree. I see globalism as a blatant attempt at fucking the working class over on a global scale.

Yes, there are differences in wealth among working class people between different countries. But the thing is, so are the living expenses.

The worker from Bangladesh earns less than the worker in the U.S. But the worker in Bangladesh also has proportional living expenses, just like the worker in the U.S does. So when looking at costs vs earnings, it usually evens out.

The globalists however try to spin a narrative that basically states that the working class in the U.S are "spoiled" because their earnings don't match the workers of Bangladesh, so they should simply let all manner of foreigners into the country to take their jobs for pay that a U.S worker can't survive on in the U.S.

And I'm going to be straight with you, I am a socialist. Just not the type which shifts resources from most productive to least productive.
A true socialist seeks good for all, by kicking out all opposing nationalities, races, and ideology.

@Reprehensibletrash ofcourse you can have globalistic socialism, what do you think labour ~~is~~ was trying to do

CIA would like you to think they’re just an American thing

@Reprehensibletrash death.

@Seven Proxies indeed, i dislike that too. Wage depression harms others in other countries at the expense of the people at the bottom, who have to sell their trades/skills/labour to live

@Kealor And I'm saying that I disagree with the notion that workers should compete against employers and vice versa. I'm saying that some of the greatest strides made in production, distribution and development come primarily from employers competing against other employers in their eternal one upmanship.

globalism causes wage depression, as does mass immigration

Marxism is what they were trying, and it's working the same way it worked under Marx. It's a crumbling pile of shit, and frankly the anglosphere deserves every moment of it

State boot licker.

That's what socialists are.

@Seven Proxies saying individuals shouldnt compete is kind of silly though, because they allways will. people allways compete

They spread their ass for the government control.

@Saul Just as it harms the poorer countries in the sense that richer countries basically steal their skilled labourers and trained professionals. The poorer countries enable their education only to see that investment being lost to richer countries because the richer countries offer higher wages.

should is nice and all, but in this case its not going to affect anything

@Seven Proxies it's in my interest to benefit the company i work for and provide a better service, as they're more likely to be willing to pay more for my services..thus i sell my labour for even more.

i see unionisation and what socialists want as an attack on my ability to do that, as the effort i put in, the skills i have and experience i have, will supercede that of other people i work with and thus i should naturally earn more anyway

Unions are shit

and indeed, brain drain is cancer