Can you prove that with science?

everything is a result of underlying material processes

Either one does not exist, or we are not able to use science to observe it

So then why would we use science to justify a belief about something science can't prove?

well can you tell me why science cannot make predictions about the immaterial world

then can you tell me how one would know if an immaterial world exists

the immaterial is incoherent

It can't because science can only rely on material observations

And I personally think you can prove it using logic but that's a can of worms I don't have time for

inferring from language twisting

what is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence

ive heard the logical arguments for God, they are all dumb

my favorite is presuppositionalism lmfao

"God is real because God is real"

checkmate atheists

they call it "epistemological circularity" and they claim its valid reasoning <:xD:595715666129190922>

@el pebble the scientific method is explicitly to "observe" something. Unless you're a psychic and not lying about it I doubt anyone can make a non material observation

Not until they're dead

through material observation we can assert there is no immaterial

because everything is material

Lmao

nothing in this universe is immaterial

I agree

The immaterial exists not inside the universe

pretending there is something transcendent is just pretending

Would you say that it’s LARP?

looking at rape porn

Hmm

<:zoeyirl:517503257464274955>

This server has some cool emojis

anywho I have yet to see evidence for God. Belief in something without evidence is not scientific

therefore religion is anti-science

I want to beat the person that added these emotes

@lachlan 🥀 steal them for my server

Do you want a pic of god

<:sad:591188782330413088>

@Riley

<:oh:603773792673595405>

sure

I have a pic of god

me2