there isnt evidence for this

Build up of charged particles

@Riley light is observable the big bang is a claim made. I won't believe it just happened by itself

we don't know anything before the planck era

inb4 red shift

redshift does demonstrate an expansion of space, yes

and get this

the CMB proves that the universe was once very dense, hot, and uniform

hmmm

so the universe use to be very dense and hot

and uniform

and its currently expanding

...what if

Expansion implies an origin point, which is roughly the big bang theory

the universe use to be small

And that origin point expanded

yes...sort of

well...not really

picture a balloon with a bunch of dots on it

there is no central point of expansion

on the surface of the balloon

There is a point where all originated

A singularity

yes

@Riley so the universe expanded? How is that even counter to a creation myth?

well, it counters the 6 day nonsense

and the 6,000 year old universe shit

of course, i use other methods to counter that

What happen before or during the singularity?

idk

at that point

the universe would have been dominated by quantum gravity

we don't have a complete theory of quantum gravity

All concepts of space and time break down at the singularity

so we can't make predictions

its more accurate to say that the laws of physics break down

or become incompatible with eachother

general relativity and quantum field theory

they begin to class when we talk about singularities

Laws of physics are supposed to be unbreakable, no?

they don't "break"