Message from @Spergerger
Discord ID: 654719979878350859
whats the argument
So are you arguing that God has potentialaity because he can still force us to accept him?
no
are you dumb
Your dichotomy makes no sense
lmao
ok
you cant grasp the basic concept
r/iamverysmart
if you have desire, there is potential necessarily
You apparently can't grasp the concept of omnipotence
its irrelevant lol
That is a false dichotomy
stay on track
lmao
Binary view
ok
Which is wrong
sperg
Nice, resort to insults
what?
no no no
god is not going to start having contradictory desires lol
you cant both want people to have free will and then say that his desire is unfullfilled when people have free will
thats nonsensical
i already explained how a quantum view still doesnt change things
The second someone resorts to insults, they lose
@Spergerger point flew over your head
>calls someone a sperg
>went and complained into general last night after Veric patched in his argument in religion
lmao
lol
is this nigga using strawman physics definitions in theological debate?
pls no
im just aghast at the lack of an argument here
We've proved why your false dichotomy is false
no you didnt
god is literally in accordance with his desires in the example you used
idk if youre trolling me
Your entire thesis is based on false assumptions
you just said "muh omnipotence fixes everything" when omnipotence is part of whats in question.
@Spergerger god having desires at all is the problem
no
yes
stay on track
god having potentiality would be the problem