like bioshock

If you can make something more efficiant after many tests than it will it better in the end

Well its not good now

wait until later before you make bias assumptions

No it's not good now but in a few more years they'll perfect it and have made a better product

"bias assumptions" Objectively SpaceX is better then boeing

and they have a better track record

they look pretty new to me

>new

they are nearly 18 years old

and boeing probably longer

plus elon has successful companies before that

he was the one who made paypal

18 is a teenager years come on

boeing hasnt been longer then spacex in the space industry

let me check

But if you look at their productiveness SpaceX has done more in those 18 years than boeing has in 50

1916

hahahaha

a 100 year old company that makes doughnuts that just went into to toothpaste isn't going to better then a toothpaste company that has ran for 20 years

thats before the world war

Spacex is a baby compared to boeing

Age matters

The last successful thing boeing did was make 747 in like 1980 or something

the failures are kind of the point tho

other companies don't feel like doing it cause it's too risky

^^^^

someone came along and has taken and still is taking that risk

@Derp By your logic legacy companies that are currently failing are better than new companies who are prospering

Meaning they're 100% less productive

spacex nearly died because of it

Ye

And now they're more important than Nasa

different goals tho

Not surprising with all the diversity hires and cutting of the budget

plus every new president setting new goals for nasa

which doesnt help progress

yup

though spacex' plan to finance their mars mission by building a constellation of over 5000 satellites is pretty kek

jej

@Nova Legacy companies have more expreince