great

They are efficiant

More like hazardous

One thing i dont get is why they chose mars to colonise, venus would be better

Boeing always takes the easy way out

the most safe way out

Meaning less efficiancy and more trouble in the end

venus would be better yet its far away

no its not, its closer then mars

and would be cheaper

Meaning they look to safety while spacex looks for ways to use less money

fuck ti is?

Bet they made the suits look cool to draw in more people

it wouldnt require environmentally sealed suits either, just hazmat suits

it is

im not a space expert, but, from wolfenstein u would need some kind of air conditioning in the suit

Guys spacex is pulling an Xbox Kinect

promising things they cant deliver

SpaceX cares about safety more than anything lol. I mean ffs they would never use something that wouldn't work

@skull_d Have you heard about the nasa havoc project?

no

So they throw away faulty stuff

l thought you said they recycle

Are you daft

basically floating blimps above venus, is more habitable than mars @skull_d

Hippo you are a fan boy

cool wow

The only problem with venus would be the poisonous gas, that can be dealt with hazmat suits

Also venus has a closer g to us

so less bone issues

there is way to get around that @Nova

etc

then mars

there is an upper atmosphere on venus that works the same way as earth

yes that is what i just said., floating flatforms

essentially blimps

Air FOBs

The newly made continent or country

Do you know how many times spaceX failed the rocket reentries? Ofc they will fail boeing fails and everyone fails. But in the end they did it and made a better product. If you're not willing to experiment for a better product you're also against the evolution of mankind and technology

like bioshock

If you can make something more efficiant after many tests than it will it better in the end