basically

kill all the american libertarians

Obviously agreed

@Local Yeehaw Dealer

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

- Should government be more or less powerful? (Authoritarianism vs Libertarianism) Please answer in terms of both economic and social policy control

Shouldnt exist

Less

Government should be more powerful state wise but less powerful in individual lives.

Government should have more power both in economics and social/individual aspects

For example, banning homosexuality, various drugs, promoting modesty and abstinence

Less government power only works with a moral society when the entire society as a whole is intelligent

And can understand their individual moral responsibility

Which is not the case in real life

Government should encourage moral expanse and nationalismZ

Part of the reason the society is such a mess is because the government doesn’t support it

Attika I don't think you realize that in order to encourage and indeed enforce a moral code the government inheritly needs more power over the individual

I don’t want the government forcing itself on me.

The individual who wants to be homosexual should not be allowed to be homosexual

1950s government worked well.

I agree

A good authoritarian government is one that can afford to remain largely unintrusive in people's private lives

Bit of both

^

I could go with that.

@Attika During the 1950's the government burned anti-state books, suppressed anti-state speech and banned anti-state articles from being published

Is that what you mean?

Yes

Nice

I think the state should allow dissenting opinions and freedom of speech, but not popular anti-state speech and anti-nationalist ideas.

Pornography should be banned as well, requiring government control over the internet

Social media platforms should be nationalized

Yes.

Allowing some dissenting opinions creates a snowball effect

Porn would go through a slow phase of being uprooted imo

I came up with a better system of allowing dissenting opinions

@Attika

Being socially shunned like smoking is, and then gradually banned

Oh?

Ban dissenting opinions completely, but if you have a dissenting opinion you can write a letter and send it directly to the leader for consideration, this also works as a direct means of suggestions to government

@☭ ⊕ Korovsky ⊕ ☭ Yes. Rig the social system to punish dissenting views instead of banning it

You wouldn't be punished for writing dissenting opinions in a letter directly to the leader