ah we have a nicker in chat

I don't always agree with Nick

But his show is funny

@The Desert Fox V chris picolinis guys are mostly feds and ex cons that cant get any other work

That guy is most likely a fed. Have him on some charge that will put him away for years

he tried to stitch up fuentes

I bet Nick Fuentes has a right curve

fuentes is a twink likely

He even said "I'm not a white supremacist" so what's the whole thing even about

that he's enabling white supremacists ig

lol not really

nick is a cryptofascist lol
somehow people havent figured it out yet

ig thats why he hasnt been thrown out of yt yet tbh

because he tries to stay *optical*

if he was openly a fascist his career would be over in days

>is evolution real

It depends, do subhumans evolve or do they plateau?

@Spergerger Nice

Fucking hate tranniea

Ongod

Based cryptofascist Fuentes

whomstves

well evolution is kinda proven right

and its also simply logical

Evolution is genetic, doesn't deny a God and is not something only Atheists believe.

If you believe in a God, then evolution is something he created, it exists through changes in DNA.

@DotNerd I think the argument being made here is that certain atheists circumvent the acknowledgement of God by Darwin and instead hold him up to the pedestal as a key figure in their ideology.

And that ultimately demonstrates both irony and ignorance.

As far as I recall the remarks, that is.

Idk, evolution is proven different from Darwin, but I understand the confusion when it was Darwin's theory that we evolved from Monkeys.

But that is not how Evolution is explained.

Yeah, the theory of Evolution is accurate, just not by Darwin, lol

Well of course, Darwin never understood the genetic basis. He exclusively ran it through phenotypes.

Right

Mendel later filled the gaps in his work by demonstrating the law of independent assortment.

I mean I'm not an expert in the studies, but I know the evolution chart quite a bit. It's pretty massive though.

Oh definitely, it’s branching.

I just finished a study of genetics for the semester.

Darwin just made do with what he and with what the common knowledge of the era had to offer; certain sections would otherwise be archaic or revised with time.

Mhm

Yeah, I imagine if he knew more about DNA, he'd have included it.